diff options
| author |   Angelo Ruocco <angelo.ruocco.90@gmail.com> | 2019-04-08 17:35:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2019-04-08 10:05:43 -0600 |
| commit | 636b8fe86bede8c9f797365986b8406ff2183f13 (patch) | |
| tree | 41abc32d7167012dce42755cf1f67aa629126be5 /block/bfq-iosched.h | |
| parent | block: remove unused variable 'def' (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-636b8fe86bede8c9f797365986b8406ff2183f13.tar.xz wireguard-linux-636b8fe86bede8c9f797365986b8406ff2183f13.zip | |
block, bfq: fix some typos in comments
Some of the comments in the bfq files had typos. This patch fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-iosched.h | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.h b/block/bfq-iosched.h index 60c148728cc5..e7dc07cf9a57 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.h +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.h @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct bfq_service_tree { * expiration. This peculiar definition allows for the following * optimization, not yet exploited: while a given entity is still in * service, we already know which is the best candidate for next - * service among the other active entitities in the same parent + * service among the other active entities in the same parent * entity. We can then quickly compare the timestamps of the * in-service entity with those of such best candidate. * @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ struct bfq_weight_counter { * * Unless cgroups are used, the weight value is calculated from the * ioprio to export the same interface as CFQ. When dealing with - * ``well-behaved'' queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much + * "well-behaved" queues (i.e., queues that do not spend too much * time to consume their budget and have true sequential behavior, and * when there are no external factors breaking anticipation) the * relative weights at each level of the cgroups hierarchy should be |