drm/i915/execlists: Ignore discrepancies in pending[] across resets

When we reset the engine, we first remove the guilty request from the
active list. If it so happens that there is a pending preemption event
to process before we handle the reset, when we inspect that event we
find ourselves a little confused as we have bent the rules slightly to
perform the reset.

Just ignore any discrepancies inside reset, we know we'll start again
from scratch afterwards.

<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6..s1 537441383us : execlists_reset: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: reset for CS error
<0>[  536.940213] i915_sel-7302    2d..1 537441386us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: submit { 10c59:2*, 10c5a:2 }
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6d.s2 537471320us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: fence 10c59:2, current 1
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6d.s2 537471321us : execlists_hold: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: fence 10c59:2, current 1 on hold
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6.Ns1 537471328us : intel_engine_reset: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: flags=10
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6.Ns1 537471421us : execlists_reset_prepare: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: depth<-1
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6.Ns1 537471422us : intel_engine_stop_cs: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0:
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6.Ns1 537472424us : intel_engine_stop_cs: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: timed out on STOP_RING -> IDLE
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6.Ns1 537472429us : __intel_gt_reset: 0000:00:02.0 engine_mask=4
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6.Ns1 537472442us : execlists_reset_rewind: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0:
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6dNs2 537472443us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: cs-irq head=4, tail=5
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6dNs2 537472444us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: csb[5]: status=0x00008002:0x20000060
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6dNs2 537472464us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: preempted { 10c59:2*, 0:0 }
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6dNs2 537472465us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 vcs0: promote { 10c59:2*, 10c5a:2 }
<0>[  536.940213]   <idle>-0       6dNs2 537472706us : assert_pending_valid: assert_pending_valid:1417 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_is_active(rq))

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200129165935.1266132-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 9eabaee93b02..008e02bb642e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1389,6 +1389,12 @@ trace_ports(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 		     ports[1] ? ports[1]->fence.seqno : 0);
 }
 
+static inline bool
+reset_in_progress(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
+{
+	return unlikely(!__tasklet_is_enabled(&execlists->tasklet));
+}
+
 static __maybe_unused bool
 assert_pending_valid(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 		     const char *msg)
@@ -1398,6 +1404,10 @@ assert_pending_valid(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
 
 	trace_ports(execlists, msg, execlists->pending);
 
+	/* We may be messing around with the lists during reset, lalala */
+	if (reset_in_progress(execlists))
+		return true;
+
 	if (!execlists->pending[0]) {
 		GEM_TRACE_ERR("Nothing pending for promotion!\n");
 		return false;
@@ -2142,12 +2152,6 @@ invalidate_csb_entries(const u32 *first, const u32 *last)
 	clflush((void *)last);
 }
 
-static inline bool
-reset_in_progress(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists)
-{
-	return unlikely(!__tasklet_is_enabled(&execlists->tasklet));
-}
-
 /*
  * Starting with Gen12, the status has a new format:
  *