diff options
| author |   Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> | 2023-10-22 17:55:51 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> | 2023-10-23 12:49:30 +0200 |
| commit | 658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2 (patch) | |
| tree | ebf37f9c33fbd04c02b68a0dddefb0453974aa37 /drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c | |
| parent | wifi: iwlwifi: fw: Add support for UATS table in UHB (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2.tar.xz wireguard-linux-658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2.zip | |
wifi: iwlwifi: empty overflow queue during flush
If a TX queue has no space for new TX frames, the driver will keep
these frames in the overflow queue, and during reclaim flow it
will retry to send the frames from that queue.
But if the reclaim flow was invoked from TX queue flush, we will also
TX these frames, which is wrong as we don't want to TX anything
after flush.
This might also cause assert 0x125F when removing the queue,
saying that the driver removes a non-empty queue
Fix this by TXing the overflow queue's frames only if we are
not in flush queue flow.
Fixes: a44509805895 ("iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file")
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231022173519.caf06c8709d9.Ibf664ccb3f952e836f8fa461ea58fc08e5c46e88@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c index 73c5f1094a75..ae5cd13cd6dd 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c @@ -1623,7 +1623,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_rx_tx_cmd_single(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, seq_ctl = le16_to_cpu(tx_resp->seq_ctl); /* we can free until ssn % q.n_bd not inclusive */ - iwl_trans_reclaim(mvm->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs); + iwl_trans_reclaim(mvm->trans, txq_id, ssn, &skbs, false); while (!skb_queue_empty(&skbs)) { struct sk_buff *skb = __skb_dequeue(&skbs); @@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ static void iwl_mvm_tx_reclaim(struct iwl_mvm *mvm, int sta_id, int tid, * block-ack window (we assume that they've been successfully * transmitted ... if not, it's too late anyway). */ - iwl_trans_reclaim(mvm->trans, txq, index, &reclaimed_skbs); + iwl_trans_reclaim(mvm->trans, txq, index, &reclaimed_skbs, is_flush); skb_queue_walk(&reclaimed_skbs, skb) { struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb); |