aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/fs/ext4
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoryangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>2019-12-13 09:49:00 +0800
committerTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>2019-12-14 17:47:13 -0500
commita70fd5ac2ea787cafe07b69dadd16b3648ad64ac (patch)
treeabffbc82ddb7b46bd87a92f05aa5707972c80e16 /fs/ext4
parentext4: unlock on error in ext4_expand_extra_isize() (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-a70fd5ac2ea787cafe07b69dadd16b3648ad64ac.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-a70fd5ac2ea787cafe07b69dadd16b3648ad64ac.zip
ext4: reserve revoke credits in __ext4_new_inode
It's possible that __ext4_new_inode will release the xattr block, so it will trigger a warning since there is revoke credits will be 0 if the handle == NULL. The below scripts can reproduce it easily. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3861 at fs/jbd2/revoke.c:374 jbd2_journal_revoke+0x30e/0x540 fs/jbd2/revoke.c:374 ... __ext4_forget+0x1d7/0x800 fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.c:248 ext4_free_blocks+0x213/0x1d60 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4743 ext4_xattr_release_block+0x55b/0x780 fs/ext4/xattr.c:1254 ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1c2c/0x2c40 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2112 ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa7e/0x1090 fs/ext4/xattr.c:2384 __ext4_set_acl+0x54d/0x6c0 fs/ext4/acl.c:214 ext4_init_acl+0x218/0x2e0 fs/ext4/acl.c:293 __ext4_new_inode+0x352a/0x42b0 fs/ext4/ialloc.c:1151 ext4_mkdir+0x2e9/0xbd0 fs/ext4/namei.c:2774 vfs_mkdir+0x386/0x5f0 fs/namei.c:3811 do_mkdirat+0x11c/0x210 fs/namei.c:3834 do_syscall_64+0xa1/0x530 arch/x86/entry/common.c:294 ... ------------------------------------- scripts: mkfs.ext4 /dev/vdb mount /dev/vdb /mnt cd /mnt && mkdir dir && for i in {1..8}; do setfacl -dm "u:user_"$i":rx" dir; done mkdir dir/dir1 && mv dir/dir1 ./ sh repro.sh && add some user [root@localhost ~]# cat repro.sh while [ 1 -eq 1 ]; do rm -rf dir rm -rf dir1/dir1 mkdir dir for i in {1..8}; do setfacl -dm "u:test"$i":rx" dir; done setfacl -m "u:user_9:rx" dir & mkdir dir1/dir1 & done Before exec repro.sh, dir1 has inherit the default acl from dir, and xattr block of dir1 dir is not the same, so the h_refcount of these two dir's xattr block will be 1. Then repro.sh can trigger the warning with the situation show as below. The last h_refcount can be clear with mkdir, and __ext4_new_inode has not reserved revoke credits, so the warning will happened, fix it by reserve revoke credits in __ext4_new_inode. Thread 1 Thread 2 mkdir dir set default acl(will create a xattr block blk1 and the refcount of ext4_xattr_header will be 1) ... mkdir dir1/dir1 ->....->ext4_init_acl ->__ext4_set_acl(set default acl, will reuse blk1, and h_refcount will be 2) setfacl->ext4_set_acl->... ->ext4_xattr_block_set(will create new block blk2 to store xattr) ->__ext4_set_acl(set access acl, since h_refcount of blk1 is 2, will create blk3 to store xattr) ->ext4_xattr_release_block(dec h_refcount of blk1 to 1) ->ext4_xattr_release_block(dec h_refcount and since it is 0, will release the block and trigger the warning) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191213014900.47228-1-yangerkun@huawei.com Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/ext4')
-rw-r--r--fs/ext4/ialloc.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index dc333e8e51e8..8ca4a23129aa 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -921,8 +921,8 @@ repeat_in_this_group:
if (!handle) {
BUG_ON(nblocks <= 0);
handle = __ext4_journal_start_sb(dir->i_sb, line_no,
- handle_type, nblocks,
- 0, 0);
+ handle_type, nblocks, 0,
+ ext4_trans_default_revoke_credits(sb));
if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
err = PTR_ERR(handle);
ext4_std_error(sb, err);