diff options
| author |   Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> | 2021-12-22 22:10:09 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> | 2022-01-08 09:39:49 -0600 |
| commit | e32cf5dfbe227b355776948b2c9b5691b84d1cbd (patch) | |
| tree | c00df29e5a3bf47010fbdf5e5dbaa20325b7d1a6 /fs/io-wq.c | |
| parent | kthread: Never put_user the set_child_tid address (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-e32cf5dfbe227b355776948b2c9b5691b84d1cbd.tar.xz wireguard-linux-e32cf5dfbe227b355776948b2c9b5691b84d1cbd.zip | |
kthread: Generalize pf_io_worker so it can point to struct kthread
The point of using set_child_tid to hold the kthread pointer was that
it already did what is necessary. There are now restrictions on when
set_child_tid can be initialized and when set_child_tid can be used in
schedule_tail. Which indicates that continuing to use set_child_tid
to hold the kthread pointer is a bad idea.
Instead of continuing to use the set_child_tid field of task_struct
generalize the pf_io_worker field of task_struct and use it to hold
the kthread pointer.
Rename pf_io_worker (which is a void * pointer) to worker_private so
it can be used to store kthreads struct kthread pointer. Update the
kthread code to store the kthread pointer in the worker_private field.
Remove the places where set_child_tid had to be dealt with carefully
because kthreads also used it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wgtFAA9SbVYg0gR1tqPMC17-NYcs0GQkaYg1bGhh1uJQQ@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87a6grvqy8.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/io-wq.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/io-wq.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c index 88202de519f6..e4fc7384b40c 100644 --- a/fs/io-wq.c +++ b/fs/io-wq.c @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ loop: */ void io_wq_worker_running(struct task_struct *tsk) { - struct io_worker *worker = tsk->pf_io_worker; + struct io_worker *worker = tsk->worker_private; if (!worker) return; @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ void io_wq_worker_running(struct task_struct *tsk) */ void io_wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *tsk) { - struct io_worker *worker = tsk->pf_io_worker; + struct io_worker *worker = tsk->worker_private; if (!worker) return; @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ void io_wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *tsk) static void io_init_new_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_worker *worker, struct task_struct *tsk) { - tsk->pf_io_worker = worker; + tsk->worker_private = worker; worker->task = tsk; set_cpus_allowed_ptr(tsk, wqe->cpu_mask); tsk->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY; |