diff options
author | 2024-07-02 00:40:22 +0100 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2024-09-12 12:20:41 +0200 | |
commit | ee4cdf7ba857a894ad1650d6ab77669cbbfa329e (patch) | |
tree | 8258e3b756adf109085d66a8b63cd08db03abad0 /fs/netfs/write_issue.c | |
parent | afs: Make read subreqs async (diff) | |
download | wireguard-linux-ee4cdf7ba857a894ad1650d6ab77669cbbfa329e.tar.xz wireguard-linux-ee4cdf7ba857a894ad1650d6ab77669cbbfa329e.zip |
netfs: Speed up buffered reading
Improve the efficiency of buffered reads in a number of ways:
(1) Overhaul the algorithm in general so that it's a lot more compact and
split the read submission code between buffered and unbuffered
versions. The unbuffered version can be vastly simplified.
(2) Read-result collection is handed off to a work queue rather than being
done in the I/O thread. Multiple subrequests can be processes
simultaneously.
(3) When a subrequest is collected, any folios it fully spans are
collected and "spare" data on either side is donated to either the
previous or the next subrequest in the sequence.
Notes:
(*) Readahead expansion is massively slows down fio, presumably because it
causes a load of extra allocations, both folio and xarray, up front
before RPC requests can be transmitted.
(*) RDMA with cifs does appear to work, both with SIW and RXE.
(*) PG_private_2-based reading and copy-to-cache is split out into its own
file and altered to use folio_queue. Note that the copy to the cache
now creates a new write transaction against the cache and adds the
folios to be copied into it. This allows it to use part of the
writeback I/O code.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814203850.2240469-20-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/netfs/write_issue.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/netfs/write_issue.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/fs/netfs/write_issue.c b/fs/netfs/write_issue.c index 25fb7e166cc0..975436d3dc3f 100644 --- a/fs/netfs/write_issue.c +++ b/fs/netfs/write_issue.c @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ struct netfs_io_request *netfs_create_write_req(struct address_space *mapping, struct netfs_io_request *wreq; struct netfs_inode *ictx; bool is_buffered = (origin == NETFS_WRITEBACK || - origin == NETFS_WRITETHROUGH); + origin == NETFS_WRITETHROUGH || + origin == NETFS_PGPRIV2_COPY_TO_CACHE); wreq = netfs_alloc_request(mapping, file, start, 0, origin); if (IS_ERR(wreq)) @@ -161,10 +162,6 @@ static void netfs_prepare_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, _enter("R=%x[%x]", wreq->debug_id, subreq->debug_index); - trace_netfs_sreq_ref(wreq->debug_id, subreq->debug_index, - refcount_read(&subreq->ref), - netfs_sreq_trace_new); - trace_netfs_sreq(subreq, netfs_sreq_trace_prepare); stream->sreq_max_len = UINT_MAX; @@ -241,8 +238,8 @@ void netfs_reissue_write(struct netfs_io_stream *stream, netfs_do_issue_write(stream, subreq); } -static void netfs_issue_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, - struct netfs_io_stream *stream) +void netfs_issue_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, + struct netfs_io_stream *stream) { struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq = stream->construct; @@ -259,9 +256,9 @@ static void netfs_issue_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, * we can avoid overrunning the credits obtained (cifs) and try to parallelise * content-crypto preparation with network writes. */ -static int netfs_advance_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, - struct netfs_io_stream *stream, - loff_t start, size_t len, bool to_eof) +int netfs_advance_write(struct netfs_io_request *wreq, + struct netfs_io_stream *stream, + loff_t start, size_t len, bool to_eof) { struct netfs_io_subrequest *subreq = stream->construct; size_t part; |