diff options
| author |   YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com> | 2021-12-16 02:04:25 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-01-19 12:51:30 -0800 |
| commit | f10d059661968b01ef61a8b516775f95a18ab8ae (patch) | |
| tree | c38cbd0409ee011dcebed1ecf7d866d455e149c4 /include/linux/bpf.h | |
| parent | libbpf: Improve btf__add_btf() with an additional hashmap for strings. (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-f10d059661968b01ef61a8b516775f95a18ab8ae.tar.xz wireguard-linux-f10d059661968b01ef61a8b516775f95a18ab8ae.zip | |
bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err instead of allow boolean
Right now BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY and related macros return 1 or 0
for whether the prog array allows or rejects whatever is being
hooked. The caller of these macros then return -EPERM or continue
processing based on thw macro's return value. Unforunately this is
inflexible, since -EPERM is the only err that can be returned.
This patch should be a no-op; it prepares for the next patch. The
returning of the -EPERM is moved to inside the macros, so the outer
functions are directly returning what the macros returned if they
are non-zero.
Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/788abcdca55886d1f43274c918eaa9f792a9f33b.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/bpf.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf.h | 16 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 6d7346c54d83..83da1764fcfe 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -1277,7 +1277,7 @@ static inline void bpf_reset_run_ctx(struct bpf_run_ctx *old_ctx) typedef u32 (*bpf_prog_run_fn)(const struct bpf_prog *prog, const void *ctx); -static __always_inline u32 +static __always_inline int BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG_FLAGS(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog, u32 *ret_flags) @@ -1287,7 +1287,7 @@ BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG_FLAGS(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, const struct bpf_prog_array *array; struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx; struct bpf_cg_run_ctx run_ctx; - u32 ret = 1; + int ret = 0; u32 func_ret; migrate_disable(); @@ -1298,7 +1298,8 @@ BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG_FLAGS(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) { run_ctx.prog_item = item; func_ret = run_prog(prog, ctx); - ret &= (func_ret & 1); + if (!(func_ret & 1)) + ret = -EPERM; *(ret_flags) |= (func_ret >> 1); item++; } @@ -1308,7 +1309,7 @@ BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG_FLAGS(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, return ret; } -static __always_inline u32 +static __always_inline int BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog) { @@ -1317,7 +1318,7 @@ BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, const struct bpf_prog_array *array; struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx; struct bpf_cg_run_ctx run_ctx; - u32 ret = 1; + int ret = 0; migrate_disable(); rcu_read_lock(); @@ -1326,7 +1327,8 @@ BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG(const struct bpf_prog_array __rcu *array_rcu, old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx); while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) { run_ctx.prog_item = item; - ret &= run_prog(prog, ctx); + if (!run_prog(prog, ctx)) + ret = -EPERM; item++; } bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx); @@ -1394,7 +1396,7 @@ out: u32 _ret; \ _ret = BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG_FLAGS(array, ctx, func, &_flags); \ _cn = _flags & BPF_RET_SET_CN; \ - if (_ret) \ + if (!_ret) \ _ret = (_cn ? NET_XMIT_CN : NET_XMIT_SUCCESS); \ else \ _ret = (_cn ? NET_XMIT_DROP : -EPERM); \ |