Compiler attributes: GCC cold function alignment workarounds

Contemporary versions of GCC (e.g. GCC 12.2.0) drop the alignment
specified by '-falign-functions=N' for functions marked with the
__cold__ attribute, and potentially for callees of __cold__ functions as
these may be implicitly marked as __cold__ by the compiler. LLVM appears
to respect '-falign-functions=N' in such cases.

This has been reported to GCC in bug 88345:

  https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345

... which also covers alignment being dropped when '-Os' is used, which
will be addressed in a separate patch.

Currently, use of '-falign-functions=N' is limited to
CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT, which is largely used for performance and/or
analysis reasons (e.g. with CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_FUNCTION_ALIGN_64B), but
isn't necessary for correct functionality. However, this dropped
alignment isn't great for the performance and/or analysis cases.

Subsequent patches will use CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT as part of arm64's
ftrace implementation, which will require all instrumented functions to
be aligned to at least 8-bytes.

This patch works around the dropped alignment by avoiding the use of the
__cold__ attribute when CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT is non-zero, and by
specifically aligning abort(), which GCC implicitly marks as __cold__.
As the __cold macro is now dependent upon config options (which is
against the policy described at the top of compiler_attributes.h), it is
moved into compiler_types.h.

I've tested this by building and booting a kernel configured with
defconfig + CONFIG_EXPERT=y + CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_FUNCTION_ALIGN_64B=y,
and looking for misaligned text symbols in /proc/kallsyms:

* arm64:

  Before:
    # uname -rm
    6.2.0-rc3 aarch64
    # grep ' [Tt] ' /proc/kallsyms | grep -iv '[048c]0 [Tt] ' | wc -l
    5009

  After:
    # uname -rm
    6.2.0-rc3-00001-g2a2bedf8bfa9 aarch64
    # grep ' [Tt] ' /proc/kallsyms | grep -iv '[048c]0 [Tt] ' | wc -l
    919

* x86_64:

  Before:
    # uname -rm
    6.2.0-rc3 x86_64
    # grep ' [Tt] ' /proc/kallsyms | grep -iv '[048c]0 [Tt] ' | wc -l
    11537

  After:
    # uname -rm
    6.2.0-rc3-00001-g2a2bedf8bfa9 x86_64
    # grep ' [Tt] ' /proc/kallsyms | grep -iv '[048c]0 [Tt] ' | wc -l
    2805

There's clearly a substantial reduction in the number of misaligned
symbols. From manual inspection, the remaining unaligned text labels are
a combination of ACPICA functions (due to the use of '-Os'), static call
trampolines, and non-function labels in assembly, which will be dealt
with in subsequent patches.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230123134603.1064407-3-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
index 7c1afe0f4129..aab34e30128e 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h
@@ -79,6 +79,33 @@ static inline void __chk_io_ptr(const volatile void __iomem *ptr) { }
 /* Attributes */
 #include <linux/compiler_attributes.h>
 
+#if CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT > 0
+#define __function_aligned		__aligned(CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT)
+#else
+#define __function_aligned
+#endif
+
+/*
+ *   gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Common-Function-Attributes.html#index-cold-function-attribute
+ *   gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Label-Attributes.html#index-cold-label-attribute
+ *
+ * When -falign-functions=N is in use, we must avoid the cold attribute as
+ * contemporary versions of GCC drop the alignment for cold functions. Worse,
+ * GCC can implicitly mark callees of cold functions as cold themselves, so
+ * it's not sufficient to add __function_aligned here as that will not ensure
+ * that callees are correctly aligned.
+ *
+ * See:
+ *
+ *   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y77%2FqVgvaJidFpYt@FVFF77S0Q05N
+ *   https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88345#c9
+ */
+#if !defined(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) || (CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT == 0)
+#define __cold				__attribute__((__cold__))
+#else
+#define __cold
+#endif
+
 /* Builtins */
 
 /*