diff options
author | 2023-01-20 17:55:04 -0800 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2023-01-20 17:55:04 -0800 | |
commit | 84150795a49ae26cf8096517b543f4cd2ed5e87f (patch) | |
tree | 75fef3d1c02d1cd14c176553806d1d49a675b4b8 /kernel | |
parent | Merge branch 'kallsyms: Optimize the search for module symbols by livepatch and bpf' (diff) | |
parent | selftests/bpf: Add dynptr helper tests (diff) | |
download | wireguard-linux-84150795a49ae26cf8096517b543f4cd2ed5e87f.tar.xz wireguard-linux-84150795a49ae26cf8096517b543f4cd2ed5e87f.zip |
Merge branch 'Dynptr fixes'
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi says:
====================
This is part 2 of https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221018135920.726360-1-memxor@gmail.com.
Changelog:
----------
v4 -> v5
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120070355.1983560-1-memxor@gmail.com
* Add comments, tests from Joanne
* Add Joanne's acks
v3 -> v4
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230120034314.1921848-1-memxor@gmail.com
* Adopt BPF ASM tests to more readable style (Alexei)
v2 -> v3
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230119021442.1465269-1-memxor@gmail.com
* Fix slice invalidation logic for unreferenced dynptrs (Joanne)
* Add selftests for precise slice invalidation on destruction
* Add Joanne's acks
v1 -> v2
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230101083403.332783-1-memxor@gmail.com
* Return error early in case of overwriting referenced dynptr slots (Andrii, Joanne)
* Rename destroy_stack_slots_dynptr to destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot (Joanne)
* Invalidate dynptr slices associated with dynptr in destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot (Joanne)
* Combine both dynptr_get_spi and is_spi_bounds_valid (Joanne)
* Compute spi once in process_dynptr_func and pass it as parameter instead of recomputing (Joanne)
* Add comments expanding REG_LIVE_WRITTEN marking in unmark_stack_slots_dynptr (Joanne)
* Add comments explaining why destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot call needs to be done for both spi
and spi - 1 (Joanne)
* Port BPF assembly tests from test_verifier to test_progs framework (Andrii)
* Address misc feedback, rebase to bpf-next
Old v1 -> v1
Old v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221018135920.726360-1-memxor@gmail.com
* Allow overwriting dynptr stack slots from dynptr init helpers
* Fix a bug in alignment check where reg->var_off.value was still not included
* Address other minor nits
Eduard Zingerman (1):
selftests/bpf: convenience macro for use with 'asm volatile' blocks
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 407 |
1 files changed, 340 insertions, 67 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index ca7db2ce70b9..ecf7fed7881c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct bpf_call_arg_meta { int mem_size; u64 msize_max_value; int ref_obj_id; + int dynptr_id; int map_uid; int func_id; struct btf *btf; @@ -638,31 +639,57 @@ static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, verbose(env, "D"); } -static int get_spi(s32 off) +static int __get_spi(s32 off) { return (-off - 1) / BPF_REG_SIZE; } +static struct bpf_func_state *func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + + return cur->frame[reg->frameno]; +} + static bool is_spi_bounds_valid(struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi, int nr_slots) { - int allocated_slots = state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; + int allocated_slots = state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; - /* We need to check that slots between [spi - nr_slots + 1, spi] are - * within [0, allocated_stack). - * - * Please note that the spi grows downwards. For example, a dynptr - * takes the size of two stack slots; the first slot will be at - * spi and the second slot will be at spi - 1. - */ - return spi - nr_slots + 1 >= 0 && spi < allocated_slots; + /* We need to check that slots between [spi - nr_slots + 1, spi] are + * within [0, allocated_stack). + * + * Please note that the spi grows downwards. For example, a dynptr + * takes the size of two stack slots; the first slot will be at + * spi and the second slot will be at spi - 1. + */ + return spi - nr_slots + 1 >= 0 && spi < allocated_slots; } -static struct bpf_func_state *func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static int dynptr_get_spi(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + int off, spi; - return cur->frame[reg->frameno]; + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + verbose(env, "dynptr has to be at a constant offset\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + off = reg->off + reg->var_off.value; + if (off % BPF_REG_SIZE) { + verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", off); + return -EINVAL; + } + + spi = __get_spi(off); + if (spi < 1) { + verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", off); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(func(env, reg), spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) + return -ERANGE; + return spi; } static const char *kernel_type_name(const struct btf* btf, u32 id) @@ -727,37 +754,58 @@ static bool dynptr_type_refcounted(enum bpf_dynptr_type type) static void __mark_dynptr_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_dynptr_type type, - bool first_slot); + bool first_slot, int dynptr_id); static void __mark_reg_not_init(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg); -static void mark_dynptr_stack_regs(struct bpf_reg_state *sreg1, +static void mark_dynptr_stack_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *sreg1, struct bpf_reg_state *sreg2, enum bpf_dynptr_type type) { - __mark_dynptr_reg(sreg1, type, true); - __mark_dynptr_reg(sreg2, type, false); + int id = ++env->id_gen; + + __mark_dynptr_reg(sreg1, type, true, id); + __mark_dynptr_reg(sreg2, type, false, id); } -static void mark_dynptr_cb_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, +static void mark_dynptr_cb_reg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_dynptr_type type) { - __mark_dynptr_reg(reg, type, true); + __mark_dynptr_reg(reg, type, true, ++env->id_gen); } +static int destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi); static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); enum bpf_dynptr_type type; - int spi, i, id; - - spi = get_spi(reg->off); - - if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) - return -EINVAL; + int spi, i, id, err; + + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; + + /* We cannot assume both spi and spi - 1 belong to the same dynptr, + * hence we need to call destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot twice for both, + * to ensure that for the following example: + * [d1][d1][d2][d2] + * spi 3 2 1 0 + * So marking spi = 2 should lead to destruction of both d1 and d2. In + * case they do belong to same dynptr, second call won't see slot_type + * as STACK_DYNPTR and will simply skip destruction. + */ + err = destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(env, state, spi); + if (err) + return err; + err = destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(env, state, spi - 1); + if (err) + return err; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_DYNPTR; @@ -768,7 +816,7 @@ static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_ if (type == BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_INVALID) return -EINVAL; - mark_dynptr_stack_regs(&state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + mark_dynptr_stack_regs(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, &state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr, type); if (dynptr_type_refcounted(type)) { @@ -781,6 +829,9 @@ static int mark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_ state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id = id; } + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + return 0; } @@ -789,10 +840,9 @@ static int unmark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); int spi, i; - spi = get_spi(reg->off); - - if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) - return -EINVAL; + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_INVALID; @@ -805,43 +855,133 @@ static int unmark_stack_slots_dynptr(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_re __mark_reg_not_init(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr); __mark_reg_not_init(env, &state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr); + + /* Why do we need to set REG_LIVE_WRITTEN for STACK_INVALID slot? + * + * While we don't allow reading STACK_INVALID, it is still possible to + * do <8 byte writes marking some but not all slots as STACK_MISC. Then, + * helpers or insns can do partial read of that part without failing, + * but check_stack_range_initialized, check_stack_read_var_off, and + * check_stack_read_fixed_off will do mark_reg_read for all 8-bytes of + * the slot conservatively. Hence we need to prevent those liveness + * marking walks. + * + * This was not a problem before because STACK_INVALID is only set by + * default (where the default reg state has its reg->parent as NULL), or + * in clean_live_states after REG_LIVE_DONE (at which point + * mark_reg_read won't walk reg->parent chain), but not randomly during + * verifier state exploration (like we did above). Hence, for our case + * parentage chain will still be live (i.e. reg->parent may be + * non-NULL), while earlier reg->parent was NULL, so we need + * REG_LIVE_WRITTEN to screen off read marker propagation when it is + * done later on reads or by mark_dynptr_read as well to unnecessary + * mark registers in verifier state. + */ + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + return 0; } -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *reg); + +static int destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_func_state *state, int spi) { - struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); - int spi, i; + struct bpf_func_state *fstate; + struct bpf_reg_state *dreg; + int i, dynptr_id; - if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) - return false; + /* We always ensure that STACK_DYNPTR is never set partially, + * hence just checking for slot_type[0] is enough. This is + * different for STACK_SPILL, where it may be only set for + * 1 byte, so code has to use is_spilled_reg. + */ + if (state->stack[spi].slot_type[0] != STACK_DYNPTR) + return 0; - spi = get_spi(reg->off); - if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS)) - return true; + /* Reposition spi to first slot */ + if (!state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot) + spi = spi + 1; + if (dynptr_type_refcounted(state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type)) { + verbose(env, "cannot overwrite referenced dynptr\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + mark_stack_slot_scratched(env, spi); + mark_stack_slot_scratched(env, spi - 1); + + /* Writing partially to one dynptr stack slot destroys both. */ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] == STACK_DYNPTR || - state->stack[spi - 1].slot_type[i] == STACK_DYNPTR) - return false; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_INVALID; + state->stack[spi - 1].slot_type[i] = STACK_INVALID; } + dynptr_id = state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id; + /* Invalidate any slices associated with this dynptr */ + bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, fstate, dreg, ({ + /* Dynptr slices are only PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL and PTR_TO_MEM */ + if (dreg->type != (PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL) && dreg->type != PTR_TO_MEM) + continue; + if (dreg->dynptr_id == dynptr_id) { + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) + __mark_reg_not_init(env, dreg); + else + __mark_reg_unknown(env, dreg); + } + })); + + /* Do not release reference state, we are destroying dynptr on stack, + * not using some helper to release it. Just reset register. + */ + __mark_reg_not_init(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr); + __mark_reg_not_init(env, &state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr); + + /* Same reason as unmark_stack_slots_dynptr above */ + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + + return 0; +} + +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, + int spi) +{ + if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) + return false; + + /* For -ERANGE (i.e. spi not falling into allocated stack slots), we + * will do check_mem_access to check and update stack bounds later, so + * return true for that case. + */ + if (spi < 0) + return spi == -ERANGE; + /* We allow overwriting existing unreferenced STACK_DYNPTR slots, see + * mark_stack_slots_dynptr which calls destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot to + * ensure dynptr objects at the slots we are touching are completely + * destructed before we reinitialize them for a new one. For referenced + * ones, destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot returns an error early instead of + * delaying it until the end where the user will get "Unreleased + * reference" error. + */ return true; } -static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static bool is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, + int spi) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); - int spi; int i; /* This already represents first slot of initialized bpf_dynptr */ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) return true; - spi = get_spi(reg->off); - if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) || - !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot) + if (spi < 0) + return false; + if (!state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.first_slot) return false; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { @@ -868,7 +1008,9 @@ static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) { return reg->dynptr.type == dynptr_type; } else { - spi = get_spi(reg->off); + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return false; return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.dynptr.type == dynptr_type; } } @@ -1449,7 +1591,7 @@ static void mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } static void __mark_dynptr_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_dynptr_type type, - bool first_slot) + bool first_slot, int dynptr_id) { /* reg->type has no meaning for STACK_DYNPTR, but when we set reg for * callback arguments, it does need to be CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, so simply @@ -1457,6 +1599,8 @@ static void __mark_dynptr_reg(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, enum bpf_dynptr_type ty */ __mark_reg_known_zero(reg); reg->type = CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR; + /* Give each dynptr a unique id to uniquely associate slices to it. */ + reg->id = dynptr_id; reg->dynptr.type = type; reg->dynptr.first_slot = first_slot; } @@ -2390,6 +2534,32 @@ static int mark_reg_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return 0; } +static int mark_dynptr_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); + int spi, ret; + + /* For CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, it must have already been done by + * check_reg_arg in check_helper_call and mark_btf_func_reg_size in + * check_kfunc_call. + */ + if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) + return 0; + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; + /* Caller ensures dynptr is valid and initialized, which means spi is in + * bounds and spi is the first dynptr slot. Simply mark stack slot as + * read. + */ + ret = mark_reg_read(env, &state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.parent, REG_LIVE_READ64); + if (ret) + return ret; + return mark_reg_read(env, &state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr, + state->stack[spi - 1].spilled_ptr.parent, REG_LIVE_READ64); +} + /* This function is supposed to be used by the following 32-bit optimization * code only. It returns TRUE if the source or destination register operates * on 64-bit, otherwise return FALSE. @@ -3303,6 +3473,10 @@ static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].sanitize_stack_spill = true; } + err = destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(env, state, spi); + if (err) + return err; + mark_stack_slot_scratched(env, spi); if (reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && register_is_bounded(reg) && !register_is_null(reg) && env->bpf_capable) { @@ -3416,6 +3590,14 @@ static int check_stack_write_var_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (err) return err; + for (i = min_off; i < max_off; i++) { + int spi; + + spi = __get_spi(i); + err = destroy_if_dynptr_stack_slot(env, state, spi); + if (err) + return err; + } /* Variable offset writes destroy any spilled pointers in range. */ for (i = min_off; i < max_off; i++) { @@ -5443,6 +5625,31 @@ static int check_stack_range_initialized( } if (meta && meta->raw_mode) { + /* Ensure we won't be overwriting dynptrs when simulating byte + * by byte access in check_helper_call using meta.access_size. + * This would be a problem if we have a helper in the future + * which takes: + * + * helper(uninit_mem, len, dynptr) + * + * Now, uninint_mem may overlap with dynptr pointer. Hence, it + * may end up writing to dynptr itself when touching memory from + * arg 1. This can be relaxed on a case by case basis for known + * safe cases, but reject due to the possibilitiy of aliasing by + * default. + */ + for (i = min_off; i < max_off + access_size; i++) { + int stack_off = -i - 1; + + spi = __get_spi(i); + /* raw_mode may write past allocated_stack */ + if (state->allocated_stack <= stack_off) + continue; + if (state->stack[spi].slot_type[stack_off % BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_DYNPTR) { + verbose(env, "potential write to dynptr at off=%d disallowed\n", i); + return -EACCES; + } + } meta->access_size = access_size; meta->regno = regno; return 0; @@ -5930,6 +6137,7 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; + int spi = 0; /* MEM_UNINIT and MEM_RDONLY are exclusive, when applied to an * ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR (or ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_*): @@ -5940,12 +6148,14 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, } /* CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR already has fixed and var_off as 0 due to * check_func_arg_reg_off's logic. We only need to check offset - * alignment for PTR_TO_STACK. + * and its alignment for PTR_TO_STACK. */ - if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && (reg->off % BPF_REG_SIZE)) { - verbose(env, "cannot pass in dynptr at an offset=%d\n", reg->off); - return -EINVAL; + if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0 && spi != -ERANGE) + return spi; } + /* MEM_UNINIT - Points to memory that is an appropriate candidate for * constructing a mutable bpf_dynptr object. * @@ -5962,7 +6172,7 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, * to. */ if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) { - if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) { + if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg, spi)) { verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -5977,13 +6187,15 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, meta->uninit_dynptr_regno = regno; } else /* MEM_RDONLY and None case from above */ { + int err; + /* For the reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK case, bpf_dynptr is never const */ if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR && !(arg_type & MEM_RDONLY)) { verbose(env, "cannot pass pointer to const bpf_dynptr, the helper mutates it\n"); return -EINVAL; } - if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg)) { + if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_init(env, reg, spi)) { verbose(env, "Expected an initialized dynptr as arg #%d\n", regno); @@ -6010,6 +6222,10 @@ int process_dynptr_func(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, err_extra, regno); return -EINVAL; } + + err = mark_dynptr_read(env, reg); + if (err) + return err; } return 0; } @@ -6347,15 +6563,29 @@ int check_func_arg_reg_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } } -static u32 dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static int dynptr_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); int spi; if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) - return reg->ref_obj_id; + return reg->id; + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; + return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.id; +} - spi = get_spi(reg->off); +static int dynptr_ref_obj_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); + int spi; + + if (reg->type == CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) + return reg->ref_obj_id; + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0) + return spi; return state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id; } @@ -6429,9 +6659,8 @@ skip_type_check: * PTR_TO_STACK. */ if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { - spi = get_spi(reg->off); - if (!is_spi_bounds_valid(state, spi, BPF_DYNPTR_NR_SLOTS) || - !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id) { + spi = dynptr_get_spi(env, reg); + if (spi < 0 || !state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.ref_obj_id) { verbose(env, "arg %d is an unacquired reference\n", regno); return -EINVAL; } @@ -7413,7 +7642,7 @@ static int set_user_ringbuf_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, * callback_fn(const struct bpf_dynptr_t* dynptr, void *callback_ctx); */ __mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_0]); - mark_dynptr_cb_reg(&callee->regs[BPF_REG_1], BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL); + mark_dynptr_cb_reg(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_1], BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL); callee->regs[BPF_REG_2] = caller->regs[BPF_REG_3]; /* unused */ @@ -7919,13 +8148,32 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_REG_ARGS; i++) { if (arg_type_is_dynptr(fn->arg_type[i])) { struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[BPF_REG_1 + i]; + int id, ref_obj_id; + + if (meta.dynptr_id) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: meta.dynptr_id already set\n"); + return -EFAULT; + } if (meta.ref_obj_id) { verbose(env, "verifier internal error: meta.ref_obj_id already set\n"); return -EFAULT; } - meta.ref_obj_id = dynptr_ref_obj_id(env, reg); + id = dynptr_id(env, reg); + if (id < 0) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: failed to obtain dynptr id\n"); + return id; + } + + ref_obj_id = dynptr_ref_obj_id(env, reg); + if (ref_obj_id < 0) { + verbose(env, "verifier internal error: failed to obtain dynptr ref_obj_id\n"); + return ref_obj_id; + } + + meta.dynptr_id = id; + meta.ref_obj_id = ref_obj_id; break; } } @@ -8081,6 +8329,9 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn return -EFAULT; } + if (is_dynptr_ref_function(func_id)) + regs[BPF_REG_0].dynptr_id = meta.dynptr_id; + if (is_ptr_cast_function(func_id) || is_dynptr_ref_function(func_id)) { /* For release_reference() */ regs[BPF_REG_0].ref_obj_id = meta.ref_obj_id; @@ -13215,10 +13466,9 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, return false; if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE != BPF_REG_SIZE - 1) continue; - if (!is_spilled_reg(&old->stack[spi])) - continue; - if (!regsafe(env, &old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, - &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, idmap)) + /* Both old and cur are having same slot_type */ + switch (old->stack[spi].slot_type[BPF_REG_SIZE - 1]) { + case STACK_SPILL: /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types * are the same as well. @@ -13229,7 +13479,30 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, * such verifier states are not equivalent. * return false to continue verification of this path */ + if (!regsafe(env, &old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, idmap)) + return false; + break; + case STACK_DYNPTR: + { + const struct bpf_reg_state *old_reg, *cur_reg; + + old_reg = &old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; + cur_reg = &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; + if (old_reg->dynptr.type != cur_reg->dynptr.type || + old_reg->dynptr.first_slot != cur_reg->dynptr.first_slot || + !check_ids(old_reg->ref_obj_id, cur_reg->ref_obj_id, idmap)) + return false; + break; + } + case STACK_MISC: + case STACK_ZERO: + case STACK_INVALID: + continue; + /* Ensure that new unhandled slot types return false by default */ + default: return false; + } } return true; } |