diff options
| author |   Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> | 2020-07-09 01:19:10 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> | 2020-07-20 13:28:16 -0400 |
| commit | 592b24cbdc12e52bdb5937c0697df9febf41f8d9 (patch) | |
| tree | 77f69fd50babed73ba3e2d8695fdbf145d4cc336 /security | |
| parent | ima: Move comprehensive rule validation checks out of the token parser (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-592b24cbdc12e52bdb5937c0697df9febf41f8d9.tar.xz wireguard-linux-592b24cbdc12e52bdb5937c0697df9febf41f8d9.zip | |
ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule
Make broader use of ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond() to check if a given
rule contains an LSM conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no
user-facing change.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security')
| -rw-r--r-- | security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c679144af042..dcd1aaac4ff0 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -360,17 +360,10 @@ static bool ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void) { struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *e; - int i, result, needs_update; + int result; list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, e, &ima_policy_rules, list) { - needs_update = 0; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) { - if (entry->lsm[i].args_p) { - needs_update = 1; - break; - } - } - if (!needs_update) + if (!ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry)) continue; result = ima_lsm_update_rule(entry); |