aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/tools/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>2020-03-12 11:50:33 -0700
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2020-03-13 00:15:16 +0100
commitb35f14f410416f06ec54d187dedc372405757290 (patch)
tree06612def5679797955f2e506c2d2f28cf3504a6c /tools/lib
parentbpftool: Add _bpftool and profiler.skel.h to .gitignore (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-b35f14f410416f06ec54d187dedc372405757290.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-b35f14f410416f06ec54d187dedc372405757290.zip
libbpf: Split BTF presence checks into libbpf- and kernel-specific parts
Needs for application BTF being present differs between user-space libbpf needs and kernel needs. Currently, BTF is mandatory only in kernel only when BPF application is using STRUCT_OPS. While libbpf itself relies more heavily on presense of BTF: - for BTF-defined maps; - for Kconfig externs; - for STRUCT_OPS as well. Thus, checks for presence and validness of bpf_object's BPF needs to be performed separately, which is patch does. Fixes: 5327644614a1 ("libbpf: Relax check whether BTF is mandatory") Reported-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200312185033.736911-1-andriin@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/lib')
-rw-r--r--tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c17
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 223be01dc466..1a787a2faf58 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -2284,9 +2284,16 @@ static void bpf_object__sanitize_btf_ext(struct bpf_object *obj)
}
}
-static bool bpf_object__is_btf_mandatory(const struct bpf_object *obj)
+static bool libbpf_needs_btf(const struct bpf_object *obj)
{
- return obj->efile.st_ops_shndx >= 0 || obj->nr_extern > 0;
+ return obj->efile.btf_maps_shndx >= 0 ||
+ obj->efile.st_ops_shndx >= 0 ||
+ obj->nr_extern > 0;
+}
+
+static bool kernel_needs_btf(const struct bpf_object *obj)
+{
+ return obj->efile.st_ops_shndx >= 0;
}
static int bpf_object__init_btf(struct bpf_object *obj,
@@ -2322,7 +2329,7 @@ static int bpf_object__init_btf(struct bpf_object *obj,
}
}
out:
- if (err && bpf_object__is_btf_mandatory(obj)) {
+ if (err && libbpf_needs_btf(obj)) {
pr_warn("BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted.\n");
return err;
}
@@ -2346,7 +2353,7 @@ static int bpf_object__finalize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj)
btf_ext__free(obj->btf_ext);
obj->btf_ext = NULL;
- if (bpf_object__is_btf_mandatory(obj)) {
+ if (libbpf_needs_btf(obj)) {
pr_warn("BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted.\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -2410,7 +2417,7 @@ static int bpf_object__sanitize_and_load_btf(struct bpf_object *obj)
obj->btf_ext = NULL;
}
- if (bpf_object__is_btf_mandatory(obj))
+ if (kernel_needs_btf(obj))
return err;
}
return 0;