diff options
| author |   Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com> | 2020-11-21 21:22:05 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2020-11-24 22:59:52 +0100 |
| commit | 1c26ac6ab3ce47ee2e6342373681dedbb97e21a3 (patch) | |
| tree | 7cf1b480524ff6224491701245827a8b6cb0fb2e /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst | |
| parent | selftest/bpf: Fix link in readme (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-1c26ac6ab3ce47ee2e6342373681dedbb97e21a3.tar.xz wireguard-linux-1c26ac6ab3ce47ee2e6342373681dedbb97e21a3.zip | |
selftest/bpf: Fix rst formatting in readme
A couple of places in the readme had invalid rst formatting causing the
rendering to be off. This patch fixes them with minimal edits.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201122022205.57229-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst | 28 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst index 3b8d8885892d..ca064180d4d0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst @@ -33,11 +33,12 @@ The verifier will reject such code with above error. At insn 18 the r7 is indeed unbounded. The later insn 19 checks the bounds and the insn 20 undoes map_value addition. It is currently impossible for the verifier to understand such speculative pointer arithmetic. -Hence - https://reviews.llvm.org/D85570 -addresses it on the compiler side. It was committed on llvm 12. +Hence `this patch`__ addresses it on the compiler side. It was committed on llvm 12. + +__ https://reviews.llvm.org/D85570 The corresponding C code + .. code-block:: c for (int i = 0; i < MAX_CGROUPS_PATH_DEPTH; i++) { @@ -80,10 +81,11 @@ The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like 17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2 only read is supported -This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix - https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466 +This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. `The fix`__ has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be -available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk. +available in 10.0.1. The patch is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk. + +__ https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466 BPF CO-RE-based tests and Clang version ======================================= @@ -97,11 +99,11 @@ them to Clang/LLVM. These sub-tests are going to be skipped if Clang is too old to support them, they shouldn't cause build failures or runtime test failures: - - __builtin_btf_type_id() ([0], [1], [2]); - - __builtin_preserve_type_info(), __builtin_preserve_enum_value() ([3], [4]). +- __builtin_btf_type_id() [0_, 1_, 2_]; +- __builtin_preserve_type_info(), __builtin_preserve_enum_value() [3_, 4_]. - [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74572 - [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74668 - [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85174 - [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83878 - [4] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83242 +.. _0: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74572 +.. _1: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74668 +.. _2: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85174 +.. _3: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83878 +.. _4: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83242 |