aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>2021-03-03 10:18:16 +0000
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2021-03-04 19:11:30 -0800
commitb4f894633fa14d7d46ba7676f950b90a401504bb (patch)
tree84687bd50bbab7707d0fbace6e3b848e58ae031b /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
parentselftests: bpf: Check that PROG_TEST_RUN repeats as requested (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-b4f894633fa14d7d46ba7676f950b90a401504bb.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-b4f894633fa14d7d46ba7676f950b90a401504bb.zip
selftests: bpf: Don't run sk_lookup in verifier tests
sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here doesn't reduce coverage. Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 58b5a349d3ba..1512092e1e68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
uint8_t flags;
void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
- uint8_t runs;
+ int runs;
#define bpf_testdata_struct_t \
struct { \
uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv; \
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
run_errs = 0;
run_successes = 0;
- if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+ if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) {
uint32_t expected_val;
int i;