diff options
author | 2019-05-26 21:47:13 -0700 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2019-05-26 21:47:13 -0700 | |
commit | b933dc367a1d85edf2db8e6edd5783ae9604813d (patch) | |
tree | ce4abde20c9401e00bad96673194800c018a4cff /tools | |
parent | Merge branch 'dpaa2-eth-Fix-smatch-warnings' (diff) | |
parent | selftests/tls: add test for sleeping even though there is data (diff) | |
download | wireguard-linux-b933dc367a1d85edf2db8e6edd5783ae9604813d.tar.xz wireguard-linux-b933dc367a1d85edf2db8e6edd5783ae9604813d.zip |
Merge branch 'net-tls-two-fixes-for-rx_list-pre-handling'
Jakub Kicinski says:
====================
net/tls: two fixes for rx_list pre-handling
tls_sw_recvmsg() had been modified to cater better to async decrypt.
Partially read records now live on the rx_list. Data is copied from
this list before the old do {} while loop, and the not included
correctly in deciding whether to sleep or not and lowat threshold
handling. These modifications, unfortunately, added some bugs.
First patch fixes lowat - we need to calculate the threshold early
and make sure all copied data is compared to the threshold, not just
the freshly decrypted data.
Third patch fixes sleep - if data is picked up from rx_list and
no flags are set, we should not put the process to sleep, but
rather return the partial read.
Patches 2 and 4 add test cases for these bugs, both will cause
a sleep and test timeout before the fix.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 34 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c index 47ddfc154036..278c86134556 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c @@ -442,6 +442,21 @@ TEST_F(tls, multiple_send_single_recv) EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(send_mem, recv_mem + send_len, send_len), 0); } +TEST_F(tls, single_send_multiple_recv_non_align) +{ + const unsigned int total_len = 15; + const unsigned int recv_len = 10; + char recv_mem[recv_len * 2]; + char send_mem[total_len]; + + EXPECT_GE(send(self->fd, send_mem, total_len, 0), 0); + memset(recv_mem, 0, total_len); + + EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem, recv_len, 0), recv_len); + EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem + recv_len, recv_len, 0), 5); + EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(send_mem, recv_mem, total_len), 0); +} + TEST_F(tls, recv_partial) { char const *test_str = "test_read_partial"; @@ -575,6 +590,25 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_peek_large_buf_mult_recs) EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, len), 0); } +TEST_F(tls, recv_lowat) +{ + char send_mem[10] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 }; + char recv_mem[20]; + int lowat = 8; + + EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, send_mem, 10, 0), 10); + EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, send_mem, 5, 0), 5); + + memset(recv_mem, 0, 20); + EXPECT_EQ(setsockopt(self->cfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVLOWAT, + &lowat, sizeof(lowat)), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem, 1, MSG_WAITALL), 1); + EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem + 1, 6, MSG_WAITALL), 6); + EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, recv_mem + 7, 10, 0), 8); + + EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(send_mem, recv_mem, 10), 0); + EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(send_mem, recv_mem + 10, 5), 0); +} TEST_F(tls, pollin) { |