diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst | 250 |
1 files changed, 163 insertions, 87 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst index b21a34c34a21..ae8bce7fecbe 100644 --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst @@ -9,6 +9,10 @@ KVM Lock Overview The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows: +- cpus_read_lock() is taken outside kvm_lock + +- kvm_usage_lock is taken outside cpus_read_lock() + - kvm->lock is taken outside vcpu->mutex - kvm->lock is taken outside kvm->slots_lock and kvm->irq_lock @@ -16,7 +20,41 @@ The acquisition orders for mutexes are as follows: - kvm->slots_lock is taken outside kvm->irq_lock, though acquiring them together is quite rare. -On x86, vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock. +- kvm->mn_active_invalidate_count ensures that pairs of + invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end() callbacks + use the same memslots array. kvm->slots_lock and kvm->slots_arch_lock + are taken on the waiting side when modifying memslots, so MMU notifiers + must not take either kvm->slots_lock or kvm->slots_arch_lock. + +cpus_read_lock() vs kvm_lock: + +- Taking cpus_read_lock() outside of kvm_lock is problematic, despite that + being the official ordering, as it is quite easy to unknowingly trigger + cpus_read_lock() while holding kvm_lock. Use caution when walking vm_list, + e.g. avoid complex operations when possible. + +For SRCU: + +- ``synchronize_srcu(&kvm->srcu)`` is called inside critical sections + for kvm->lock, vcpu->mutex and kvm->slots_lock. These locks _cannot_ + be taken inside a kvm->srcu read-side critical section; that is, the + following is broken:: + + srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu); + mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock); + +- kvm->slots_arch_lock instead is released before the call to + ``synchronize_srcu()``. It _can_ therefore be taken inside a + kvm->srcu read-side critical section, for example while processing + a vmexit. + +On x86: + +- vcpu->mutex is taken outside kvm->arch.hyperv.hv_lock and kvm->arch.xen.xen_lock + +- kvm->arch.mmu_lock is an rwlock; critical sections for + kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock and kvm->arch.mmu_unsync_pages_lock must + also take kvm->arch.mmu_lock Everything else is a leaf: no other lock is taken inside the critical sections. @@ -31,25 +69,24 @@ the mmu-lock on x86. Currently, the page fault can be fast in one of the following two cases: 1. Access Tracking: The SPTE is not present, but it is marked for access - tracking i.e. the SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK is set. That means we need to - restore the saved R/X bits. This is described in more detail later below. + tracking. That means we need to restore the saved R/X bits. This is + described in more detail later below. -2. Write-Protection: The SPTE is present and the fault is - caused by write-protect. That means we just need to change the W bit of - the spte. +2. Write-Protection: The SPTE is present and the fault is caused by + write-protect. That means we just need to change the W bit of the spte. -What we use to avoid all the race is the SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE bit and -SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit on the spte: +What we use to avoid all the races is the Host-writable bit and MMU-writable bit +on the spte: -- SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE means the gfn is writable on host. -- SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE means the gfn is writable on mmu. The bit is set when - the gfn is writable on guest mmu and it is not write-protected by shadow - page write-protection. +- Host-writable means the gfn is writable in the host kernel page tables and in + its KVM memslot. +- MMU-writable means the gfn is writable in the guest's mmu and it is not + write-protected by shadow page write-protection. On fast page fault path, we will use cmpxchg to atomically set the spte W -bit if spte.SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE = 1 and spte.SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT = 1, or -restore the saved R/X bits if VMX_EPT_TRACK_ACCESS mask is set, or both. This -is safe because whenever changing these bits can be detected by cmpxchg. +bit if spte.HOST_WRITEABLE = 1 and spte.WRITE_PROTECT = 1, to restore the saved +R/X bits if for an access-traced spte, or both. This is safe because whenever +changing these bits can be detected by cmpxchg. But we need carefully check these cases: @@ -98,10 +135,10 @@ We dirty-log for gfn1, that means gfn2 is lost in dirty-bitmap. For direct sp, we can easily avoid it since the spte of direct sp is fixed to gfn. For indirect sp, we disabled fast page fault for simplicity. -A solution for indirect sp could be to pin the gfn, for example via -kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_pfn_atomic, before the cmpxchg. After the pinning: +A solution for indirect sp could be to pin the gfn before the cmpxchg. After +the pinning: -- We have held the refcount of pfn that means the pfn can not be freed and +- We have held the refcount of pfn; that means the pfn can not be freed and be reused for another gfn. - The pfn is writable and therefore it cannot be shared between different gfns by KSM. @@ -110,115 +147,133 @@ Then, we can ensure the dirty bitmaps is correctly set for a gfn. 2) Dirty bit tracking -In the origin code, the spte can be fast updated (non-atomically) if the +In the original code, the spte can be fast updated (non-atomically) if the spte is read-only and the Accessed bit has already been set since the Accessed bit and Dirty bit can not be lost. But it is not true after fast page fault since the spte can be marked writable between reading spte and updating spte. Like below case: -+------------------------------------------------------------------------+ -| At the beginning:: | -| | -| spte.W = 0 | -| spte.Accessed = 1 | -+------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ -| CPU 0: | CPU 1: | -+------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ -| In mmu_spte_clear_track_bits():: | | -| | | -| old_spte = *spte; | | -| | | -| | | -| /* 'if' condition is satisfied. */| | -| if (old_spte.Accessed == 1 && | | -| old_spte.W == 0) | | -| spte = 0ull; | | -+------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ -| | on fast page fault path:: | -| | | -| | spte.W = 1 | -| | | -| | memory write on the spte:: | -| | | -| | spte.Dirty = 1 | -+------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ -| :: | | -| | | -| else | | -| old_spte = xchg(spte, 0ull) | | -| if (old_spte.Accessed == 1) | | -| kvm_set_pfn_accessed(spte.pfn);| | -| if (old_spte.Dirty == 1) | | -| kvm_set_pfn_dirty(spte.pfn); | | -| OOPS!!! | | -+------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ ++-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +| At the beginning:: | +| | +| spte.W = 0 | +| spte.Accessed = 1 | ++-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ +| CPU 0: | CPU 1: | ++-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ +| In mmu_spte_update():: | | +| | | +| old_spte = *spte; | | +| | | +| | | +| /* 'if' condition is satisfied. */ | | +| if (old_spte.Accessed == 1 && | | +| old_spte.W == 0) | | +| spte = new_spte; | | ++-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ +| | on fast page fault path:: | +| | | +| | spte.W = 1 | +| | | +| | memory write on the spte:: | +| | | +| | spte.Dirty = 1 | ++-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ +| :: | | +| | | +| else | | +| old_spte = xchg(spte, new_spte);| | +| if (old_spte.Accessed && | | +| !new_spte.Accessed) | | +| flush = true; | | +| if (old_spte.Dirty && | | +| !new_spte.Dirty) | | +| flush = true; | | +| OOPS!!! | | ++-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ The Dirty bit is lost in this case. In order to avoid this kind of issue, we always treat the spte as "volatile" -if it can be updated out of mmu-lock, see spte_has_volatile_bits(), it means, +if it can be updated out of mmu-lock [see spte_needs_atomic_update()]; it means the spte is always atomically updated in this case. 3) flush tlbs due to spte updated -If the spte is updated from writable to readonly, we should flush all TLBs, +If the spte is updated from writable to read-only, we should flush all TLBs, otherwise rmap_write_protect will find a read-only spte, even though the writable spte might be cached on a CPU's TLB. As mentioned before, the spte can be updated to writable out of mmu-lock on -fast page fault path, in order to easily audit the path, we see if TLBs need -be flushed caused by this reason in mmu_spte_update() since this is a common +fast page fault path. In order to easily audit the path, we see if TLBs needing +to be flushed caused this reason in mmu_spte_update() since this is a common function to update spte (present -> present). Since the spte is "volatile" if it can be updated out of mmu-lock, we always -atomically update the spte, the race caused by fast page fault can be avoided, -See the comments in spte_has_volatile_bits() and mmu_spte_update(). +atomically update the spte and the race caused by fast page fault can be avoided. +See the comments in spte_needs_atomic_update() and mmu_spte_update(). Lockless Access Tracking: This is used for Intel CPUs that are using EPT but do not support the EPT A/D -bits. In this case, when the KVM MMU notifier is called to track accesses to a -page (via kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young), it marks the PTE as not-present -by clearing the RWX bits in the PTE and storing the original R & X bits in -some unused/ignored bits. In addition, the SPTE_SPECIAL_MASK is also set on the -PTE (using the ignored bit 62). When the VM tries to access the page later on, -a fault is generated and the fast page fault mechanism described above is used -to atomically restore the PTE to a Present state. The W bit is not saved when -the PTE is marked for access tracking and during restoration to the Present -state, the W bit is set depending on whether or not it was a write access. If -it wasn't, then the W bit will remain clear until a write access happens, at -which time it will be set using the Dirty tracking mechanism described above. +bits. In this case, PTEs are tagged as A/D disabled (using ignored bits), and +when the KVM MMU notifier is called to track accesses to a page (via +kvm_mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young), it marks the PTE not-present in hardware +by clearing the RWX bits in the PTE and storing the original R & X bits in more +unused/ignored bits. When the VM tries to access the page later on, a fault is +generated and the fast page fault mechanism described above is used to +atomically restore the PTE to a Present state. The W bit is not saved when the +PTE is marked for access tracking and during restoration to the Present state, +the W bit is set depending on whether or not it was a write access. If it +wasn't, then the W bit will remain clear until a write access happens, at which +time it will be set using the Dirty tracking mechanism described above. 3. Reference ------------ -:Name: kvm_lock +``kvm_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^ + :Type: mutex :Arch: any :Protects: - vm_list -:Name: kvm_count_lock -:Type: raw_spinlock_t +``kvm_usage_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +:Type: mutex :Arch: any -:Protects: - hardware virtualization enable/disable -:Comment: 'raw' because hardware enabling/disabling must be atomic /wrt - migration. +:Protects: - kvm_usage_count + - hardware virtualization enable/disable +:Comment: Exists to allow taking cpus_read_lock() while kvm_usage_count is + protected, which simplifies the virtualization enabling logic. + +``kvm->mn_invalidate_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +:Type: spinlock_t +:Arch: any +:Protects: mn_active_invalidate_count, mn_memslots_update_rcuwait -:Name: kvm_arch::tsc_write_lock -:Type: raw_spinlock +``kvm_arch::tsc_write_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +:Type: raw_spinlock_t :Arch: x86 :Protects: - kvm_arch::{last_tsc_write,last_tsc_nsec,last_tsc_offset} - tsc offset in vmcb :Comment: 'raw' because updating the tsc offsets must not be preempted. -:Name: kvm->mmu_lock -:Type: spinlock_t +``kvm->mmu_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +:Type: spinlock_t or rwlock_t :Arch: any :Protects: -shadow page/shadow tlb entry :Comment: it is a spinlock since it is used in mmu notifier. -:Name: kvm->srcu +``kvm->srcu`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :Type: srcu lock :Arch: any :Protects: - kvm->memslots @@ -229,14 +284,35 @@ which time it will be set using the Dirty tracking mechanism described above. The srcu index can be stored in kvm_vcpu->srcu_idx per vcpu if it is needed by multiple functions. -:Name: blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock +``kvm->slots_arch_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +:Type: mutex +:Arch: any (only needed on x86 though) +:Protects: any arch-specific fields of memslots that have to be modified + in a ``kvm->srcu`` read-side critical section. +:Comment: must be held before reading the pointer to the current memslots, + until after all changes to the memslots are complete + +``wakeup_vcpus_on_cpu_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :Type: spinlock_t :Arch: x86 -:Protects: blocked_vcpu_on_cpu +:Protects: wakeup_vcpus_on_cpu :Comment: This is a per-CPU lock and it is used for VT-d posted-interrupts. - When VT-d posted-interrupts is supported and the VM has assigned + When VT-d posted-interrupts are supported and the VM has assigned devices, we put the blocked vCPU on the list blocked_vcpu_on_cpu - protected by blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock, when VT-d hardware issues + protected by blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock. When VT-d hardware issues wakeup notification event since external interrupts from the assigned devices happens, we will find the vCPU on the list to wakeup. + +``vendor_module_lock`` +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +:Type: mutex +:Arch: x86 +:Protects: loading a vendor module (kvm_amd or kvm_intel) +:Comment: Exists because using kvm_lock leads to deadlock. kvm_lock is taken + in notifiers, e.g. __kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier(), that may be invoked while + cpu_hotplug_lock is held, e.g. from cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(), and many + operations need to take cpu_hotplug_lock when loading a vendor module, e.g. + updating static calls. |