| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Extract the "is this memory region local?" check into a helper.
I'll have another use for this in the BIOS FB takeover.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250313140838.29742-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
|
|
i915_active_acquire_for_context() was added in 2020 by
commit 5d9341370f57 ("drm/i915: Export a preallocate variant of
i915_active_acquire()") but has never been used.
The last use of __i915_gem_object_is_lmem() was removed in 2021 by
commit ff20afc4cee7 ("drm/i915: Update error capture code to avoid using
the current vma state")
Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241227113754.25871-1-tursulin@igalia.com
|
|
i915_gem_object_create_lmem_from_data() lacks the flush of the data
written to lmem to ensure the object is marked as dirty and the writes
flushed to the backing store. Once created, we can immediately release
the obj->mm.mapping caching of the vmap.
Fixes: 7acbbc7cf485 ("drm/i915/guc: put all guc objects in lmem when available")
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.16+
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230316165918.13074-1-nirmoy.das@intel.com
|
|
drm/i915 drm-intel-next -> drm-intel-gt-next cross-merge sync
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
# Conflicts:
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/87y1ywbh5y.fsf@intel.com
|
|
In order to get the GSC Support merged on drm-intel-gt-next
in a clean fashion we needed this ATS-M patch to avoid
conflict in i915_pci.c:
commit 412c942bdfae ("drm/i915/ats-m: add ATS-M platform info")
--
Fixing a silent conflict on drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_gmch.c:
- if (!intel_vtd_active(i915))
+ if (!i915_vtd_active(i915))
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
|
|
drm/drm-next has a build fix for the NewVision NV3052C panel
(drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c), which needs to be
merged back to drm-misc-next, as it was failing to build there.
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
|
|
Add an usage for submissions independent of implicit sync but still
interesting for memory management.
v2: cleanup the kerneldoc a bit
v3: separate amdgpu changes from this
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-10-christian.koenig@amd.com
|
|
This change adds the dma_resv_usage enum and allows us to specify why a
dma_resv object is queried for its containing fences.
Additional to that a dma_resv_usage_rw() helper function is added to aid
retrieving the fences for a read or write userspace submission.
This is then deployed to the different query functions of the dma_resv
object and all of their users. When the write paratermer was previously
true we now use DMA_RESV_USAGE_WRITE and DMA_RESV_USAGE_READ otherwise.
v2: add KERNEL/OTHER in separate patch
v3: some kerneldoc suggestions by Daniel
v4: some more kerneldoc suggestions by Daniel, fix missing cases lost in
the rebase pointed out by Bas.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220407085946.744568-2-christian.koenig@amd.com
|
|
With the upcoming multitile support each tile will have its own
local memory. Mark the current LMEM with the suffix '0' to
emphasise that it belongs to the root tile.
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220318233938.149744-2-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
|
|
Remove the uapi/drm/i915_drm.h include from drm/i915_drm.h, and stop
being a proxy for uapi/drm/i915_drm.h. Include uapi/drm/i915_drm.h and
drm/i915_drm.h only where needed.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311100639.114685-2-jani.nikula@intel.com
|
|
Somehow we managed to invert the test for i915_gem_object_evictable(),
which causes a warning in DG1 BAT, igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.
Fix the lock check to only warn if the object *is* indeed evictable and
not protected from eviction by fences.
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Fixes: 91160c839824 ("drm/i915: Take pinning into account in __i915_gem_object_is_lmem")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922083807.888206-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
|
Don't blow up on a GEM_WARN_ON in __i915_gem_object_is_lmem if the
object is pinned (not evictable).
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916162819.27848-6-matthew.brost@intel.com
|
|
The firmware binary has to be loaded from lmem and the recommendation is
to put all other objects in there as well. Note that we don't fall back
to system memory if the allocation in lmem fails because all objects are
allocated during driver load and if we have issues with lmem at that point
something is seriously wrong with the system, so no point in trying to
handle it.
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Cc: Radoslaw Szwichtenberg <radoslaw.szwichtenberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210916162819.27848-3-matthew.brost@intel.com
|
|
For some specialised objects we might need something larger than the
regions min_page_size due to some hw restriction, and slightly more
hairy is needing something smaller with the guarantee that such objects
will never be inserted into any GTT, which is the case for the paging
structures.
This also fixes how we setup the BO page_alignment, if we later migrate
the object somewhere else. For example if the placements are {SMEM,
LMEM}, then we might get this wrong. Pushing the min_page_size behaviour
into the manager should fix this.
v2(Thomas): push the default page size behaviour into buddy_man, and let
the user override it with the page-alignment, which looks cleaner
v3: rebase on ttm sys changes
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625103824.558481-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
|
Objects intended to be used as display framebuffers must reside in
LMEM for discrete. If they happen to not do that, migrate them to
LMEM before pinning.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210629151203.209465-4-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
|
The object ops i915_GEM_OBJECT_HAS_IOMEM and the object
I915_BO_ALLOC_STRUCT_PAGE flags are considered immutable by
much of our code. Introduce a new mem_flags member to hold these
and make sure checks for these flags being set are either done
under the object lock or with pages properly pinned. The flags
will change during migration under the object lock.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210624084240.270219-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
|
Since objects can be migrated or evicted when not pinned or locked,
update the checks for lmem residency or future residency so that
the value returned is not immediately stale.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-3-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
|
Most logical place to introduce TTM buffer objects is as an i915
gem object backend. We need to add some ops to account for added
functionality like delayed delete and LRU list manipulation.
Initially we support only LMEM and SYSTEM memory, but SYSTEM
(which in this case means evicted LMEM objects) is not
visible to i915 GEM yet. The plan is to move the i915 gem system region
over to the TTM system memory type in upcoming patches.
We set up GPU bindings directly both from LMEM and from the system region,
as there is no need to use the legacy TTM_TT memory type. We reserve
that for future porting of GGTT bindings to TTM.
Remove the old lmem backend.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210610070152.572423-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
|
Temporarily remove the buddy allocator and related selftests
and hook up the TTM range manager for i915 regions.
Also modify the mock region selftests somewhat to account for a
fragmenting manager.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210602083818.241793-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
|
|
In the scenario where local memory is available, we have
rely on CPU access via lmem directly instead of aperture.
v2:
gmch is only relevant for much older hw, therefore we can drop the
has_aperture check since it should always be present on such platforms.
(Chris)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris P Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: CQ Tang <cq.tang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210427085417.120246-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
|
Underneath it's the same stuff, so things like the PTE_LM bits for the
GTT should just keep working as-is.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210421104658.304142-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
|
We want to remove the changing of ops structure for attaching
phys pages, so we need to kill off HAS_STRUCT_PAGE from ops->flags,
and put it in the bo.
This will remove a potential race of dereferencing the wrong obj->ops
without ww mutex held.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: apply with wiggle]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-8-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
|
Give more flexibility to the caller, if they already have an allocated
object, in case they wish to apply some transformation to the object
prior to handing it over to the region specific initialisation step,
like in gem_create_ext where we would like to first apply the extensions
to the object.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114182402.840247-3-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
|
Name the object classes and their offspring for easier lockdep
debugging.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200529183204.16850-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Create a vmap for discontinguous lmem objects to support
i915_gem_object_pin_map().
v2: Offset io address by region.start for fake-lmem
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200102204215.1519103-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
When creating a handle, it is just that, an abstract handle. The fact
that we cannot currently support a handle larger than the size of the
backing storage is an artifact of our whole-object-at-a-time handling in
get_pages() and being an implementation limitation is best handled at
that point -- similar to shmem, where we only barf when asked to
populate the whole object if larger than RAM. (Pinning the whole object
at a time is major hindrance that we are likely to have to overcome in
the near future.) In the case of the buddy allocator, the late check is
preferable as the request size may often be smaller than the required
size.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191216122603.2598155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
Intended for upstream testing so that we can still exercise the LMEM
plumbing and !i915_ggtt_has_aperture paths. Smoke tested on Skull Canyon
device. This works by allocating an intel_memory_region for a reserved
portion of system memory, which we treat like LMEM. For the LMEMBAR we
steal the aperture and 1:1 it map to the stolen region.
To enable simply set the i915 modparam fake_lmem_start= on the kernel
cmdline with the start of reserved region(see memmap=). The size of the
region we can use is determined by the size of the mappable aperture, so
the size of reserved region should be >= mappable_end. For now we only
enable for the selftests. Depends on CONFIG_DRM_I915_UNSTABLE being
enabled.
eg. memmap=2G$16G i915.fake_lmem_start=0x400000000
v2: make fake_lmem_start an i915 modparam
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191030173320.8850-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
|
|
We can create LMEM objects, but we also need to support mapping them
into kernel space for internal use.
Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve Hampson <steven.t.hampson@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
|
We currently define LMEM, or local memory, as just another memory
region, like system memory or stolen, which we can expose to userspace
and can be mapped to the CPU via some BAR.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191025153728.23689-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
|
Ville Syrjälä
Dr. David Alan Gilbert
Chris Wilson
Tvrtko Ursulin
Rodrigo Vivi
Paul Cercueil
Christian König
Andi Shyti
Jani Nikula
Thomas Hellström
Matthew Brost
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
Matthew Auld
Anusha Srivatsa
Maarten Lankhorst
Chris Wilson
Abdiel Janulgue