| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
| |
Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@.
No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to
catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of
code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the
actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
|
|
|
| |
cpu_disklabel can go away, since nothing anymore needs to use it; ok miod
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ok tedu
|
|
|
|
|
| |
VOP, crypto and disklabel ok tedu@
audio(9) ok naddy@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
o) .Nm always has argument in .Sh SYNOPSIS;
o) We always closes .Bl and .Bd tags;
millert@ ok
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
sentence breaks, and other such things.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If those pages are different from the NetBSD version, maybe there's a
reason ?
Like, possibly, I just read our source code, which just happens to do
things in DIFFERENT ways than NetBSD does ?
As far as the added pages go, they obviously haven't been checked against
actual code as well, hence they're worse than useless, since a large part
of the information is definitely misleading.
|
|
|