summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/share/man/man9/extent.9 (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* use .Mt for AUTHORS email; from Jan Stary <hans at stare dot cz>; ok jmc@schwarze2013-07-171-5/+5
|
* Replace old-fashioned .Fd by new-fangled .In for #include lines.schwarze2013-06-041-4/+4
| | | | | Diff from Jan Klemkow <j dot klemkow at wemelug dot de> on tech@. No objection from jmc@ against this type of change.
* Add a new EX_FILLED flag to make extent_create() create an extent map thatkettenis2009-04-191-2/+13
| | | | | | has all space allocated such that we can make holes in it using extent_free(). ok miod@
* Add EX_CONFLICTOK flag that allows an allocation to conflict with existingkettenis2009-04-101-4/+10
| | | | | | allocations, making sure that the union of all space is allocated. ok deraadt@
* First pass at removing clauses 3 and 4 from NetBSD licenses.ray2008-06-261-9/+2
| | | | | | | | | Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the actual authors. OK deraadt@
* convert to new .Dd format;jmc2007-05-311-2/+2
|
* deploy .An -nosplit; ok jmcjaredy2005-09-301-1/+2
|
* simplify macro usage;jmc2003-07-021-5/+2
| | | | from wiz@netbsd
* - section reorderjmc2003-06-061-7/+8
| | | | | | - macro fixes - kill whitespace at EOL - use .Ox for OpenBSD, .Fx for FreeBSD
* Be more explitic that extent_free on EX_NOCOALESCE extents (assumingjason2002-08-091-1/+5
| | | | otherwise valid arguments) cannot fail.
* Document the skew argument to extent_alloc and extent_alloc_subregion.millert2001-10-051-4/+30
| | | | From NetBSD.
* .Sh AUTHOR -> AUTHORS, ok aaron@todd2000-11-101-2/+2
|
* General man page cleanups, mostly to remove trailing whitespace, hardaaron2000-10-121-45/+54
| | | | sentence breaks, and other such things.
* REVERT TO PREVIOUS STATE OF AFFAIR.espie1999-09-221-131/+80
| | | | | | | | | | | | If those pages are different from the NetBSD version, maybe there's a reason ? Like, possibly, I just read our source code, which just happens to do things in DIFFERENT ways than NetBSD does ? As far as the added pages go, they obviously haven't been checked against actual code as well, hence they're worse than useless, since a large part of the information is definitely misleading.
* Add/update some man9 pages from NetBSDcsapuntz1999-09-221-80/+131
|
* New man pages, adapted from NetBSD.espie1999-09-051-0/+334
Add corresponding cross-references. Missed some uses of .Dv.