| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
and if so, force soft carrier mode.
|
|
|
|
| |
ok tedu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Most of the hard work by mpi@, who provided the initial diff.
Fixes for sparc from myself. Tested on sgi and sparc myself.
Compiles and detects zstty on my powerbook, compile tested on
sparc64 by me. Real testing with zs device on sparc64 by miod@
who also gave a lot of help and feedback.
ok miod@, mpi@
|
|
|
|
| |
ok deraadt matthew millert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
max-baud-rate hint. Adjust TTYHOG (the nearly full logic) to this new
situation. The larger buffers are required by the very high speed
KDDI devices in Japan (CF com, or USB ucom) so those are the only two
drivers which currently ask for a larger buffer size.
ok yasuoka miod
|
|
|
|
| |
a process instead of using curproc. ok deraadt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
supported it doesn't do any harm), so put the KNOTE() in selwakeup() itself and
remove it from any occurences where both are used, except one for kqueue itself
and one in sys_pipe.c (where the selwakeup is under a PIPE_SEL flag).
Based on a diff from tedu.
ok deraadt
|
|
|
|
| |
miod@ deraadt@ ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
calls can go directly into selwakeup() safely
long discussion with nicm, murmers of consent from tedu and miod, noone
else seems to care of kqueue is busted as long as it makes their sockets
move data fast... pretty sad.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
things such that code that only need a second-resolution uptime or wall
time, and used to get that from time.tv_secs or mono_time.tv_secs now get
this from separate time_t globals time_second and time_uptime.
ok art@ niklas@ nordin@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
separate tty registering is gone now that sparc has switched to wscons, and
this makes the code less error-prone.
Also, remove tests for ttymalloc() failure, since it uses M_WAITOK.
ok millert@ deraadt@, tested by various people as well besides me...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
argument. old cred only calls user suser_ucred. this will allow future
work to more flexibly implement the idea of a root process. looks like
something i saw in freebsd, but a little different.
use of suser_ucred vs suser in file system code should be looked at again,
for the moment semantics remain unchanged.
review and input from art@ testing and further review miod@
|
|
|
|
| |
rescinded 22 July 1999. Proofed by myself and Theo.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NetBSD 961107 state. Other has not, partly because sometimes the bus.h
changes was coupled with other changes.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
independent or correct as he thinks it is)
|