| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
With DT support for clocks, irqchips, timers, and PCI now in place, DT
based booting has feature parity with non-DT legacy boot. The final
piece is actually enabling common clock support on Versatile. Enabling
full DT support requires either removing the old Versatile clock code,
updating the legacy boot to use the common clock code, or making DT and
legacy boot mutually exclusive. Given that removing legacy boot code is
the goal anyway, I am going with the 1st option.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
People often point to the Integrator/Versatile/Realview
implementations to justify using the consumer name as the sole
selector for clocks.
Eliminate this excuse by changing the Versatile implementation, so
it provides a better example of how it should be done.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
Rob Herring
Russell King
Russell King