| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> says:
As noted by some people, some parts of the recently added extensions
(svpbmt, zicbom) + t-head errata could use some styling upgrades.
So this series provides these.
changes in v2:
- add patch also converting cpufeature probe to BIT()
- update commit message in patch1 (Conor)
Heiko Stuebner (5):
riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing
riscv: drop some idefs from CMO initialization
riscv: use BIT() macros in t-head errata init
riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing
riscv: check for kernel config option in t-head memory types errata
arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 14 ++++++-----
arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 2 ++
arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 39 ++++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-1-heiko@sntech.de
* b4-shazam-merge:
riscv: check for kernel config option in t-head memory types errata
riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing
riscv: use BIT() macros in t-head errata init
riscv: drop some idefs from CMO initialization
riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
The t-head variant of page-based memory types should also check first
for the enabled kernel config option.
Fixes: a35707c3d850 ("riscv: add memory-type errata for T-Head")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-6-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Using the appropriate BIT macro makes the code better readable.
Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-4-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Wrapping things in #ifdefs makes the code harder to read
while we also have IS_ENABLED() macros to do this in regular code
and the extension detection is not _that_ runtime critical.
So define a stub for riscv_noncoherent_supported() in the
non-CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT case and move the code to
us IS_ENABLED.
Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-3-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to
the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could
fire on an uninitialized hart ID.
The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer
initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA
that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will
just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also
changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before
enabling Zicbom support.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
CC: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
CC: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant")
Fixes: 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
[Conor: fixed the redefinition errors]
Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220912224800.998121-1-mail@conchuod.ie
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
The T-Head C906 and C910 implement a scheme for handling
cache operations different from the generic Zicbom extension.
Add an errata for it next to the generic dma coherency ops.
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706231536.2041855-5-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Having a list of alternatives to check with a per-entry function pointer
to a check function is nice style-wise. But in case of early-alternatives
it can clash with the non-relocated kernel and the function pointer in
the list pointing to a completely wrong location.
This isn't an issue with one or two list entries, as in that case the
compiler seems to unroll the loop and even usage of the list structure
and then only does relative jumps into the check functions based on this.
When adding a third entry to either list though, the issue that was
hiding there from the beginning is triggered resulting a jump to a
memory address that isn't part of the kernel at all.
The list of features/erratas only contained an unused name and the
pointer to the check function, so an easy solution for the problem
is to just unroll the loop in code, dismantle the whole list structure
and just call the relevant check functions one by one ourself.
For the T-Head errata this includes moving the stage-check inside
the check functions.
The issue is only relevant for things that might be called for early-
alternatives (T-Head and possible future main extensions), so the
SiFive erratas were not affected from the beginning, as they got
an early return for early-alternatives in the original patchset.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220526205646.258337-6-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Some current cpus based on T-Head cores implement memory-types
way different than described in the svpbmt spec even going
so far as using PTE bits marked as reserved.
Add the T-Head vendor-id and necessary errata code to
replace the affected instructions.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511192921.2223629-13-heiko@sntech.de
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
Palmer Dabbelt
Heiko Stuebner