aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGuillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>2022-02-02 19:30:28 +0100
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2022-02-03 19:11:21 -0800
commitbafe517af2995762010b78422131e5b7270292e4 (patch)
treefa5a133619a8a467fdd7c0483a3a5aaffcc1bb21 /tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh
parentnet: minor __dev_alloc_name() optimization (diff)
downloadlinux-bafe517af2995762010b78422131e5b7270292e4.tar.xz
linux-bafe517af2995762010b78422131e5b7270292e4.zip
selftests: fib offload: use sensible tos values
Although both iproute2 and the kernel accept 1 and 2 as tos values for new routes, those are invalid. These values only set ECN bits, which are ignored during IPv4 fib lookups. Therefore, no packet can actually match such routes. This selftest therefore only succeeds because it doesn't verify that the new routes do actually work in practice (it just checks if the routes are offloaded or not). It makes more sense to use tos values that don't conflict with ECN. This way, the selftest won't be affected if we later decide to warn or even reject invalid tos configurations for new routes. Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e43b343720360a1c0e4f5947d9e917b26f30fbf.1643826556.git.gnault@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh
index e134a5f529c9..1b3b46292179 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/fib_offload_lib.sh
@@ -99,15 +99,15 @@ fib_ipv4_tos_test()
fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 0 metric 1024" false
check_err $? "Route not in hardware when should"
- ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 2 metric 1024
- fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 2 metric 1024" false
+ ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 8 metric 1024
+ fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 8 metric 1024" false
check_err $? "Highest TOS route not in hardware when should"
fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 0 metric 1024" true
check_err $? "Lowest TOS route still in hardware when should not"
- ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 1 metric 1024
- fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 1 metric 1024" true
+ ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 4 metric 1024
+ fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 4 metric 1024" true
check_err $? "Middle TOS route in hardware when should not"
log_test "IPv4 routes with TOS"
@@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ fib_ipv4_replay_tos_test()
ip -n $ns link set dev dummy1 up
ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 0
- ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 1
+ ip -n $ns route add 192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 4
devlink -N $ns dev reload $devlink_dev
- fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 1" false
+ fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 4" false
check_err $? "Highest TOS route not in hardware when should"
fib4_trap_check $ns "192.0.2.0/24 dev dummy1 tos 0" true