reformatted text

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 25 deletions

diff --git a/sys/scsi/README.ss b/sys/scsi/README.ss
index 88603af1b12..d88bd836b21 100644
--- a/sys/scsi/README.ss
+++ b/sys/scsi/README.ss
@@ -1,35 +1,33 @@
-$OpenBSD: README.ss,v 1.1 1997/03/08 21:21:37 kstailey Exp $
+$OpenBSD: README.ss,v 1.2 1997/03/08 21:23:42 kstailey Exp $
 
 If you think SCSI tape drives are quirky you haven't seen anything.
 
-There are many SCSI scanners that don't use the SCSI Scanner protocol
-with CDB's like SET_WINDOW.  Instead they send Esc-code sequences over
-the SCSI bus using the READ and WRITE operations.  True brain death at
-its finest.  The HP ScanJet, the Sharp JX-600S and the Epson ES-300C
-are among these.
+There are many SCSI scanners that don't use the SCSI Scanner protocol with
+CDB's like SET_WINDOW.  Instead they send Esc-code sequences over the SCSI
+bus using the READ and WRITE operations.  True brain death at its finest.
+The HP ScanJet, the Sharp JX-600S and the Epson ES-300C are among these.
 
-Ricoh, UMAX, Mustek, Fujitsu, Microtek on the other hand all try to
-use the SCSI scanner protocol, but scanning, unlike reading a block
-from a disk, is a multi-step operation.  Certain steps must be
-performed in sequence and the protocol does not define this.  In
-addition vendors are permitted by the SCSI spec. to have unique
-additional features that the spec. does not fully define.  Last but not
-least vendors make mistakes in implementing the spec.
+Ricoh, UMAX, Mustek, Fujitsu, Microtek on the other hand all try to use the
+SCSI scanner protocol, but scanning, unlike reading a block from a disk, is
+a multi-step operation.  Certain steps must be performed in sequence and
+the protocol does not define this.  In addition vendors are permitted by
+the SCSI spec. to have unique additional features that the spec. does not
+fully define.  Last but not least vendors make mistakes in implementing the
+spec.
 
 My SCSI scanner driver architecture is designed to support scanners
 two ways.
 
-The first way is used if a scanner uses CDB's like SET_WINDOW. The
-driver code should be in ss.c and quirk tables and sequence strings
-etc. can battle it out.  This part is not fully implemented yet.
-Work is being done on it from time to time.
+The first way is used if a scanner uses CDB's like SET_WINDOW. The driver
+code should be in ss.c and quirk tables and sequence strings etc. can
+battle it out.  This part is not fully implemented yet.  Work is being done
+on it from time to time.
 
-The other way is used when the driver is used with an
-Esc-code-over-SCSI case like a ScanJet it installs an "operations
-switch" so that parts of the code in ss.c can be bypassed.  This
-feature is implemented for ScanJets.  Currently some Mustek scanners
-use this approach, as the Mustek scanners use MODE_SELECT and not
-SET_WINDOW to send parameter data.  However it is possible that too
-much code was farmed out to ss_mustek.c; it may be that common code
-for ssread() in ss.c could be used.
+The other way is used when the driver is used with an Esc-code-over-SCSI
+case like a ScanJet it installs an "operations switch" so that parts of the
+code in ss.c can be bypassed.  This feature is implemented for ScanJets.
+Currently some Mustek scanners use this approach, as the Mustek scanners
+use MODE_SELECT and not SET_WINDOW to send parameter data.  However it is
+possible that too much code was farmed out to ss_mustek.c; it may be that
+common code for ssread() in ss.c could be used.