Import LLVM 10.0.0 release including clang, lld and lldb.

ok hackroom
tested by plenty

1 files changed, 375 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp b/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0731c81d9f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,375 @@
+//===- unittests/Driver/MultilibTest.cpp --- Multilib tests ---------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Unit tests for Multilib and MultilibSet
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "clang/Driver/Multilib.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/LLVM.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/StringSwitch.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+using namespace clang::driver;
+using namespace clang;
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, MultilibValidity) {
+
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().isValid()) << "Empty multilib is not valid";
+
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").isValid())
+      << "Single indicative flag is not valid";
+
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("-foo").isValid())
+      << "Single contraindicative flag is not valid";
+
+  ASSERT_FALSE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foo").isValid())
+      << "Conflicting flags should invalidate the Multilib";
+
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("+foo").isValid())
+      << "Multilib should be valid even if it has the same flag twice";
+
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib().flag("+foo").flag("-foobar").isValid())
+      << "Seemingly conflicting prefixes shouldn't actually conflict";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity1) {
+  Multilib M;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M == M) << "Multilib::operator==() is not reflexive";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity2) {
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Multilib() == Multilib())
+      << "Separately constructed default multilibs are not equal";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqReflexivity3) {
+  Multilib M1, M2;
+  M1.flag("+foo");
+  M2.flag("+foo");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with the same flag should be the same";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence1) {
+  Multilib M1, M2;
+  M1.flag("+foo");
+  M2.flag("-foo");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same";
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Multilibs with conflicting flags are not the same (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence2) {
+  Multilib M1, M2;
+  M2.flag("+foo");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Flags make Multilibs different";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence1) {
+  Multilib M1, M2;
+  M1.flag("+foo");
+  M2.flag("+foo").flag("+foo");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2) << "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Flag duplication shouldn't affect equivalence (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence2) {
+  Multilib M1("64");
+  Multilib M2;
+  M2.gccSuffix("/64");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
+      << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix()";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::gccSuffix() (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence3) {
+  Multilib M1("", "32");
+  Multilib M2;
+  M2.osSuffix("/32");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
+      << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix()";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::osSuffix() (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqEquivalence4) {
+  Multilib M1("", "", "16");
+  Multilib M2;
+  M2.includeSuffix("/16");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
+      << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix()";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Constructor argument must match Multilib::includeSuffix() (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence3) {
+  Multilib M1("foo");
+  Multilib M2("bar");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing gccSuffixes should be different";
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Differing gccSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence4) {
+  Multilib M1("", "foo");
+  Multilib M2("", "bar");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing osSuffixes should be different";
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Differing osSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, OpEqInequivalence5) {
+  Multilib M1("", "", "foo");
+  Multilib M2("", "", "bar");
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M1 == M2) << "Differing includeSuffixes should be different";
+  ASSERT_FALSE(M2 == M1)
+      << "Differing includeSuffixes should be different (commuted)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, Construction1) {
+  Multilib M("gcc64", "os64", "inc64");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M.gccSuffix() == "/gcc64");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M.osSuffix() == "/os64");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M.includeSuffix() == "/inc64");
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, Construction2) {
+  Multilib M1;
+  Multilib M2("");
+  Multilib M3("", "");
+  Multilib M4("", "", "");
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M2)
+      << "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (first argument)";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M3)
+      << "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (second argument)";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(M1 == M4)
+      << "Default arguments to Multilib constructor broken (third argument)";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, Construction3) {
+  Multilib M = Multilib().flag("+f1").flag("+f2").flag("-f3");
+  for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(),
+                                            E = M.flags().end();
+       I != E; ++I) {
+    ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(*I)
+                    .Cases("+f1", "+f2", "-f3", true)
+                    .Default(false));
+  }
+}
+
+static bool hasFlag(const Multilib &M, StringRef Flag) {
+  for (Multilib::flags_list::const_iterator I = M.flags().begin(),
+                                            E = M.flags().end();
+       I != E; ++I) {
+    if (*I == Flag)
+      return true;
+    else if (StringRef(*I).substr(1) == Flag.substr(1))
+      return false;
+  }
+  return false;
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction1) {
+  // Single maybe
+  MultilibSet MS;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0);
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64"));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2);
+  for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    if (I->gccSuffix() == "/64")
+      ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "+m64");
+    else if (I->gccSuffix() == "")
+      ASSERT_TRUE(I->flags()[0] == "-m64");
+    else
+      FAIL() << "Unrecognized gccSufix: " << I->gccSuffix();
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetConstruction2) {
+  // Double maybe
+  MultilibSet MS;
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("sof").flag("+sof"));
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL"));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 4);
+  for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    ASSERT_TRUE(I->isValid()) << "Multilb " << *I << " should be valid";
+    ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
+                    .Cases("", "/sof", "/el", "/sof/el", true)
+                    .Default(false))
+        << "Multilib " << *I << " wasn't expected";
+    ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
+                    .Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-sof"))
+                    .Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "+sof"))
+                    .Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "-sof"))
+                    .Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+sof"))
+                    .Default(false))
+        << "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}sof flag";
+    ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
+                    .Case("", hasFlag(*I, "-EL"))
+                    .Case("/sof", hasFlag(*I, "-EL"))
+                    .Case("/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL"))
+                    .Case("/sof/el", hasFlag(*I, "+EL"))
+                    .Default(false))
+        << "Multilib " << *I << " didn't have the appropriate {+,-}EL flag";
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetPushback) {
+  MultilibSet MS;
+  MS.push_back(Multilib("one"));
+  MS.push_back(Multilib("two"));
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 2);
+  for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    ASSERT_TRUE(llvm::StringSwitch<bool>(I->gccSuffix())
+                    .Cases("/one", "/two", true)
+                    .Default(false));
+  }
+  MS.clear();
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.size() == 0);
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetRegexFilter) {
+  MultilibSet MS;
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("one"));
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("two"));
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("three"));
+  ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2)
+      << "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
+  MS.FilterOut("/one/two/three");
+  ASSERT_EQ(MS.size(), (unsigned)2 * 2 * 2 - 1)
+      << "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
+  for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    ASSERT_TRUE(I->gccSuffix() != "/one/two/three")
+        << "The filter should have removed " << *I;
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetFilterObject) {
+  MultilibSet MS;
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("orange"));
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("pear"));
+  MS.Maybe(Multilib("plum"));
+  ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ +
+                            1 /* pear */ +
+                            1 /* plum */ +
+                            1 /* pear/plum */ +
+                            1 /* orange */ +
+                            1 /* orange/pear */ +
+                            1 /* orange/plum */ +
+                            1 /* orange/pear/plum */ )
+      << "Size before filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
+  MS.FilterOut([](const Multilib &M) {
+    return StringRef(M.gccSuffix()).startswith("/p");
+  });
+  ASSERT_EQ((int)MS.size(), 1 /* Default */ +
+                            1 /* orange */ +
+                            1 /* orange/pear */ +
+                            1 /* orange/plum */ + 
+                            1 /* orange/pear/plum */ )
+      << "Size after filter was incorrect. Contents:\n" << MS;
+  for (MultilibSet::const_iterator I = MS.begin(), E = MS.end(); I != E; ++I) {
+    ASSERT_FALSE(StringRef(I->gccSuffix()).startswith("/p"))
+        << "The filter should have removed " << *I;
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection1) {
+  MultilibSet MS1 = MultilibSet()
+    .Maybe(Multilib("64").flag("+m64"));
+
+  Multilib::flags_list FlagM64;
+  FlagM64.push_back("+m64");
+  Multilib SelectionM64;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagM64, SelectionM64))
+      << "Flag set was {\"+m64\"}, but selection not found";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionM64.gccSuffix() == "/64")
+      << "Selection picked " << SelectionM64 << " which was not expected";
+
+  Multilib::flags_list FlagNoM64;
+  FlagNoM64.push_back("-m64");
+  Multilib SelectionNoM64;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS1.select(FlagNoM64, SelectionNoM64))
+      << "Flag set was {\"-m64\"}, but selection not found";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(SelectionNoM64.gccSuffix() == "")
+      << "Selection picked " << SelectionNoM64 << " which was not expected";
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetSelection2) {
+  MultilibSet MS2 = MultilibSet()
+    .Maybe(Multilib("el").flag("+EL"))
+    .Maybe(Multilib("sf").flag("+SF"));
+
+  for (unsigned I = 0; I < 4; ++I) {
+    bool IsEL = I & 0x1;
+    bool IsSF = I & 0x2;
+    Multilib::flags_list Flags;
+    if (IsEL)
+      Flags.push_back("+EL");
+    else
+      Flags.push_back("-EL");
+
+    if (IsSF)
+      Flags.push_back("+SF");
+    else
+      Flags.push_back("-SF");
+
+    Multilib Selection;
+    ASSERT_TRUE(MS2.select(Flags, Selection)) << "Selection failed for "
+                                              << (IsEL ? "+EL" : "-EL") << " "
+                                              << (IsSF ? "+SF" : "-SF");
+
+    std::string Suffix;
+    if (IsEL)
+      Suffix += "/el";
+    if (IsSF)
+      Suffix += "/sf";
+
+    ASSERT_EQ(Selection.gccSuffix(), Suffix) << "Selection picked " << Selection
+                                             << " which was not expected ";
+  }
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetCombineWith) {
+  MultilibSet Coffee;
+  Coffee.push_back(Multilib("coffee"));
+  MultilibSet Milk;
+  Milk.push_back(Multilib("milk"));
+  MultilibSet Latte;
+  ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)0);
+  Latte.combineWith(Coffee);
+  ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)1);
+  Latte.combineWith(Milk);
+  ASSERT_EQ(Latte.size(), (unsigned)2);
+}
+
+TEST(MultilibTest, SetPriority) {
+  MultilibSet MS;
+  MS.push_back(Multilib("foo", {}, {}, 1).flag("+foo"));
+  MS.push_back(Multilib("bar", {}, {}, 2).flag("+bar"));
+
+  Multilib::flags_list Flags1;
+  Flags1.push_back("+foo");
+  Flags1.push_back("-bar");
+  Multilib Selection1;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.select(Flags1, Selection1))
+      << "Flag set was {\"+foo\"}, but selection not found";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Selection1.gccSuffix() == "/foo")
+      << "Selection picked " << Selection1 << " which was not expected";
+
+  Multilib::flags_list Flags2;
+  Flags2.push_back("+foo");
+  Flags2.push_back("+bar");
+  Multilib Selection2;
+  ASSERT_TRUE(MS.select(Flags2, Selection2))
+      << "Flag set was {\"+bar\"}, but selection not found";
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Selection2.gccSuffix() == "/bar")
+      << "Selection picked " << Selection2 << " which was not expected";
+}