summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorpatrick <patrick@openbsd.org>2020-08-03 14:31:31 +0000
committerpatrick <patrick@openbsd.org>2020-08-03 14:31:31 +0000
commite5dd70708596ae51455a0ffa086a00c5b29f8583 (patch)
tree5d676f27b570bacf71e786c3b5cff3e6f6679b59 /gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp
parentImport LLVM 10.0.0 release including clang, lld and lldb. (diff)
downloadwireguard-openbsd-e5dd70708596ae51455a0ffa086a00c5b29f8583.tar.xz
wireguard-openbsd-e5dd70708596ae51455a0ffa086a00c5b29f8583.zip
Import LLVM 10.0.0 release including clang, lld and lldb.
ok hackroom tested by plenty
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp')
-rw-r--r--gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp124
1 files changed, 124 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp b/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..adc972e1c3d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/llvm/clang/unittests/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+//===- unittest/Tooling/RecursiveASTVisitorTests/DeclRefExpr.cpp ----------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#include "TestVisitor.h"
+
+using namespace clang;
+
+namespace {
+
+class DeclRefExprVisitor : public ExpectedLocationVisitor<DeclRefExprVisitor> {
+public:
+ DeclRefExprVisitor() : ShouldVisitImplicitCode(false) {}
+
+ bool shouldVisitImplicitCode() const { return ShouldVisitImplicitCode; }
+
+ void setShouldVisitImplicitCode(bool NewValue) {
+ ShouldVisitImplicitCode = NewValue;
+ }
+
+ bool VisitDeclRefExpr(DeclRefExpr *Reference) {
+ Match(Reference->getNameInfo().getAsString(), Reference->getLocation());
+ return true;
+ }
+
+private:
+ bool ShouldVisitImplicitCode;
+};
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsBaseClassTemplateArguments) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 2, 3);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "void x(); template <void (*T)()> class X {};\nX<x> y;"));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsCXXForRangeStmtRange) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 2, 25);
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 2, 30);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "int x[5];\n"
+ "void f() { for (int i : x) { x[0] = 1; } }",
+ DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsCallExpr) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 1, 22);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "void x(); void y() { x(); }"));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsExplicitLambdaCaptureInit) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 20);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "void f() { int i; [i]{}; }",
+ DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsUseOfImplicitLambdaCapture) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 24);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "void f() { int i; [=]{ i; }; }",
+ DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsImplicitLambdaCaptureInit) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.setShouldVisitImplicitCode(true);
+ // We're expecting "i" to be visited twice: once for the initialization expr
+ // for the captured variable "i" outside of the lambda body, and again for
+ // the use of "i" inside the lambda.
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 20, /*Times=*/1);
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 24, /*Times=*/1);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "void f() { int i; [=]{ i; }; }",
+ DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX11));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsLambdaInitCaptureInit) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("i", 1, 24);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "void f() { int i; [a = i + 1]{}; }",
+ DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_CXX14));
+}
+
+/* FIXME: According to Richard Smith this is a bug in the AST.
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsBaseClassTemplateArgumentsInInstantiation) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 3, 43);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "template <typename T> void x();\n"
+ "template <void (*T)()> class X {};\n"
+ "template <typename T> class Y : public X< x<T> > {};\n"
+ "Y<int> y;"));
+}
+*/
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsExtension) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("s", 1, 24);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver(
+ "int s = __extension__ (s);\n"));
+}
+
+TEST(RecursiveASTVisitor, VisitsCopyExprOfBlockDeclCapture) {
+ DeclRefExprVisitor Visitor;
+ Visitor.ExpectMatch("x", 3, 24);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Visitor.runOver("void f(int(^)(int)); \n"
+ "void g() { \n"
+ " f([&](int x){ return x; }); \n"
+ "}",
+ DeclRefExprVisitor::Lang_OBJCXX11));
+}
+
+} // end anonymous namespace