Import LLVM 10.0.0 release including clang, lld and lldb.

ok hackroom
tested by plenty

2 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gnu/llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/backticks/.categories b/gnu/llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/backticks/.categories
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3a3f4df6416
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/backticks/.categories
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+cmdline
diff --git a/gnu/llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/backticks/TestBackticksWithoutATarget.py b/gnu/llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/backticks/TestBackticksWithoutATarget.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fdef89c6e05
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/llvm/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/functionalities/backticks/TestBackticksWithoutATarget.py
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+"""
+Test that backticks without a target should work (not infinite looping).
+"""
+
+
+
+import lldb
+from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
+from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
+from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
+
+
+class BackticksWithNoTargetTestCase(TestBase):
+
+    mydir = TestBase.compute_mydir(__file__)
+
+    @no_debug_info_test
+    def test_backticks_no_target(self):
+        """A simple test of backticks without a target."""
+        self.expect("print `1+2-3`",
+                    substrs=[' = 0'])