diff options
author | 2020-08-03 14:33:06 +0000 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2020-08-03 14:33:06 +0000 | |
commit | 061da546b983eb767bad15e67af1174fb0bcf31c (patch) | |
tree | 83c78b820819d70aa40c36d90447978b300078c5 /gnu/llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp | |
parent | Import LLVM 10.0.0 release including clang, lld and lldb. (diff) | |
download | wireguard-openbsd-061da546b983eb767bad15e67af1174fb0bcf31c.tar.xz wireguard-openbsd-061da546b983eb767bad15e67af1174fb0bcf31c.zip |
Import LLVM 10.0.0 release including clang, lld and lldb.
ok hackroom
tested by plenty
Diffstat (limited to 'gnu/llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | gnu/llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp | 272 |
1 files changed, 272 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gnu/llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp b/gnu/llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2b26f65816b --- /dev/null +++ b/gnu/llvm/lldb/source/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +//===-- BreakpointResolverFileLine.cpp --------------------------*- C++ -*-===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "lldb/Breakpoint/BreakpointResolverFileLine.h" + +#include "lldb/Breakpoint/BreakpointLocation.h" +#include "lldb/Core/Module.h" +#include "lldb/Symbol/CompileUnit.h" +#include "lldb/Symbol/Function.h" +#include "lldb/Utility/Log.h" +#include "lldb/Utility/StreamString.h" + +using namespace lldb; +using namespace lldb_private; + +// BreakpointResolverFileLine: +BreakpointResolverFileLine::BreakpointResolverFileLine( + Breakpoint *bkpt, const FileSpec &file_spec, uint32_t line_no, + uint32_t column, lldb::addr_t offset, bool check_inlines, + bool skip_prologue, bool exact_match) + : BreakpointResolver(bkpt, BreakpointResolver::FileLineResolver, offset), + m_file_spec(file_spec), m_line_number(line_no), m_column(column), + m_inlines(check_inlines), m_skip_prologue(skip_prologue), + m_exact_match(exact_match) {} + +BreakpointResolverFileLine::~BreakpointResolverFileLine() {} + +BreakpointResolver *BreakpointResolverFileLine::CreateFromStructuredData( + Breakpoint *bkpt, const StructuredData::Dictionary &options_dict, + Status &error) { + llvm::StringRef filename; + uint32_t line_no; + uint32_t column; + bool check_inlines; + bool skip_prologue; + bool exact_match; + bool success; + + lldb::addr_t offset = 0; + + success = options_dict.GetValueForKeyAsString(GetKey(OptionNames::FileName), + filename); + if (!success) { + error.SetErrorString("BRFL::CFSD: Couldn't find filename entry."); + return nullptr; + } + + success = options_dict.GetValueForKeyAsInteger( + GetKey(OptionNames::LineNumber), line_no); + if (!success) { + error.SetErrorString("BRFL::CFSD: Couldn't find line number entry."); + return nullptr; + } + + success = + options_dict.GetValueForKeyAsInteger(GetKey(OptionNames::Column), column); + if (!success) { + // Backwards compatibility. + column = 0; + } + + success = options_dict.GetValueForKeyAsBoolean(GetKey(OptionNames::Inlines), + check_inlines); + if (!success) { + error.SetErrorString("BRFL::CFSD: Couldn't find check inlines entry."); + return nullptr; + } + + success = options_dict.GetValueForKeyAsBoolean( + GetKey(OptionNames::SkipPrologue), skip_prologue); + if (!success) { + error.SetErrorString("BRFL::CFSD: Couldn't find skip prologue entry."); + return nullptr; + } + + success = options_dict.GetValueForKeyAsBoolean( + GetKey(OptionNames::ExactMatch), exact_match); + if (!success) { + error.SetErrorString("BRFL::CFSD: Couldn't find exact match entry."); + return nullptr; + } + + FileSpec file_spec(filename); + + return new BreakpointResolverFileLine(bkpt, file_spec, line_no, column, + offset, check_inlines, skip_prologue, + exact_match); +} + +StructuredData::ObjectSP +BreakpointResolverFileLine::SerializeToStructuredData() { + StructuredData::DictionarySP options_dict_sp( + new StructuredData::Dictionary()); + + options_dict_sp->AddStringItem(GetKey(OptionNames::FileName), + m_file_spec.GetPath()); + options_dict_sp->AddIntegerItem(GetKey(OptionNames::LineNumber), + m_line_number); + options_dict_sp->AddIntegerItem(GetKey(OptionNames::Column), + m_column); + options_dict_sp->AddBooleanItem(GetKey(OptionNames::Inlines), m_inlines); + options_dict_sp->AddBooleanItem(GetKey(OptionNames::SkipPrologue), + m_skip_prologue); + options_dict_sp->AddBooleanItem(GetKey(OptionNames::ExactMatch), + m_exact_match); + + return WrapOptionsDict(options_dict_sp); +} + +// Filter the symbol context list to remove contexts where the line number was +// moved into a new function. We do this conservatively, so if e.g. we cannot +// resolve the function in the context (which can happen in case of line-table- +// only debug info), we leave the context as is. The trickiest part here is +// handling inlined functions -- in this case we need to make sure we look at +// the declaration line of the inlined function, NOT the function it was +// inlined into. +void BreakpointResolverFileLine::FilterContexts(SymbolContextList &sc_list, + bool is_relative) { + if (m_exact_match) + return; // Nothing to do. Contexts are precise. + + llvm::StringRef relative_path; + if (is_relative) + relative_path = m_file_spec.GetDirectory().GetStringRef(); + + Log * log = GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_BREAKPOINTS); + for(uint32_t i = 0; i < sc_list.GetSize(); ++i) { + SymbolContext sc; + sc_list.GetContextAtIndex(i, sc); + if (is_relative) { + // If the path was relative, make sure any matches match as long as the + // relative parts of the path match the path from support files + auto sc_dir = sc.line_entry.file.GetDirectory().GetStringRef(); + if (!sc_dir.endswith(relative_path)) { + // We had a relative path specified and the relative directory doesn't + // match so remove this one + LLDB_LOG(log, "removing not matching relative path {0} since it " + "doesn't end with {1}", sc_dir, relative_path); + sc_list.RemoveContextAtIndex(i); + --i; + continue; + } + } + + if (!sc.block) + continue; + + FileSpec file; + uint32_t line; + const Block *inline_block = sc.block->GetContainingInlinedBlock(); + if (inline_block) { + const Declaration &inline_declaration = inline_block->GetInlinedFunctionInfo()->GetDeclaration(); + if (!inline_declaration.IsValid()) + continue; + file = inline_declaration.GetFile(); + line = inline_declaration.GetLine(); + } else if (sc.function) + sc.function->GetStartLineSourceInfo(file, line); + else + continue; + + if (file != sc.line_entry.file) { + LLDB_LOG(log, "unexpected symbol context file {0}", sc.line_entry.file); + continue; + } + + // Compare the requested line number with the line of the function + // declaration. In case of a function declared as: + // + // int + // foo() + // { + // ... + // + // the compiler will set the declaration line to the "foo" line, which is + // the reason why we have -1 here. This can fail in case of two inline + // functions defined back-to-back: + // + // inline int foo1() { ... } + // inline int foo2() { ... } + // + // but that's the best we can do for now. + // One complication, if the line number returned from GetStartLineSourceInfo + // is 0, then we can't do this calculation. That can happen if + // GetStartLineSourceInfo gets an error, or if the first line number in + // the function really is 0 - which happens for some languages. + const int decl_line_is_too_late_fudge = 1; + if (line && m_line_number < line - decl_line_is_too_late_fudge) { + LLDB_LOG(log, "removing symbol context at {0}:{1}", file, line); + sc_list.RemoveContextAtIndex(i); + --i; + } + } +} + +Searcher::CallbackReturn BreakpointResolverFileLine::SearchCallback( + SearchFilter &filter, SymbolContext &context, Address *addr) { + SymbolContextList sc_list; + + assert(m_breakpoint != nullptr); + + // There is a tricky bit here. You can have two compilation units that + // #include the same file, and in one of them the function at m_line_number + // is used (and so code and a line entry for it is generated) but in the + // other it isn't. If we considered the CU's independently, then in the + // second inclusion, we'd move the breakpoint to the next function that + // actually generated code in the header file. That would end up being + // confusing. So instead, we do the CU iterations by hand here, then scan + // through the complete list of matches, and figure out the closest line + // number match, and only set breakpoints on that match. + + // Note also that if file_spec only had a file name and not a directory, + // there may be many different file spec's in the resultant list. The + // closest line match for one will not be right for some totally different + // file. So we go through the match list and pull out the sets that have the + // same file spec in their line_entry and treat each set separately. + + FileSpec search_file_spec = m_file_spec; + const bool is_relative = m_file_spec.IsRelative(); + if (is_relative) + search_file_spec.GetDirectory().Clear(); + + const size_t num_comp_units = context.module_sp->GetNumCompileUnits(); + for (size_t i = 0; i < num_comp_units; i++) { + CompUnitSP cu_sp(context.module_sp->GetCompileUnitAtIndex(i)); + if (cu_sp) { + if (filter.CompUnitPasses(*cu_sp)) + cu_sp->ResolveSymbolContext(search_file_spec, m_line_number, m_inlines, + m_exact_match, eSymbolContextEverything, + sc_list); + } + } + + FilterContexts(sc_list, is_relative); + + StreamString s; + s.Printf("for %s:%d ", m_file_spec.GetFilename().AsCString("<Unknown>"), + m_line_number); + + SetSCMatchesByLine(filter, sc_list, m_skip_prologue, s.GetString(), + m_line_number, m_column); + + return Searcher::eCallbackReturnContinue; +} + +lldb::SearchDepth BreakpointResolverFileLine::GetDepth() { + return lldb::eSearchDepthModule; +} + +void BreakpointResolverFileLine::GetDescription(Stream *s) { + s->Printf("file = '%s', line = %u, ", m_file_spec.GetPath().c_str(), + m_line_number); + if (m_column) + s->Printf("column = %u, ", m_column); + s->Printf("exact_match = %d", m_exact_match); +} + +void BreakpointResolverFileLine::Dump(Stream *s) const {} + +lldb::BreakpointResolverSP +BreakpointResolverFileLine::CopyForBreakpoint(Breakpoint &breakpoint) { + lldb::BreakpointResolverSP ret_sp(new BreakpointResolverFileLine( + &breakpoint, m_file_spec, m_line_number, m_column, m_offset, m_inlines, + m_skip_prologue, m_exact_match)); + + return ret_sp; +} |