| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
a system/superuser binary. At the same time, move the source code from its
current lib/libssl/src/apps location to a more appropriate home under
usr.bin/openssl.
ok deraadt@ miod@
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
load_config() once when we start.
ok miod@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The underlying code has long been removed, making this a no-op.
If your random subsystem actually requires that you seed it from a file,
then you really should go and buy a new random subsystem that was built
after 1990.
Diff from Brent Cook.
ok deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this again in each app.
ok miod@
|
|
|
|
| |
before calling free - of some course parts of the code already did this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently "apps.h" needs to be included before any of the openssl headers
and there are several cases where the code depends on headers that are
included by something included by apps.h...
More untangling saved for later on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
in each application (since there is no longer a non-monolithic mode).
In typical OpenSSL fashion, the code is inconsistent and there are multiple
ways that bio_err was initialised - none of them actually checked to see if
the initialisation actually succeeded. Additionally, it is worth noting
that in at least two cases bio_err was also being used before it would have
been initialised.
ok miod@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN) and apps_shutdown is a no-op. So just do that
instead.
ok beck@
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
ok tedu@
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
USE_SOCKETS is unrelated to using sockets, but just pulls in .h files. It
makes every file buy a kitchen sink, because 11 files forgot to.
EXIT() is really exit(), a gentle surprise
but... OPENSSL_EXIT() is really just return(), because noone compiles the
openssl command non-monolithic anymore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
OPENSSL_foo wrappers. This changes:
OPENSSL_malloc->malloc
OPENSSL_free->free
OPENSSL_relloc->realloc
OPENSSL_freeFunc->free
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
know that MS_STATIC doesn't mean it is static? How far can lies
and half-truths be layered? I wonder if anyone got fooled, and
actually returned a pointer..
ok beck
|
| |
|
|
|