| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
miod explained it was initially a long as it was thought drivers may
need to allocate storage but in practice they don't need more than
32 bits for an attribute.
suggested and reviewed by miod@
|
|
|
|
| |
ok dlg@ mpi@ bcook@ millert@ miod@
|
|
|
|
| |
no functional change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
return zero on success and nonzero on failure.
This commit only performs mechanical changes for the existing emulops to
always return zero.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not sure what's more surprising: how long it took for NetBSD to
catch up to the rest of the BSDs (including UCB), or the amount of
code that NetBSD has claimed for itself without attributing to the
actual authors.
OK deraadt@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
for frame buffer work), it is no surprise that the less-than-8-bpp code
is completely wrong when run on a little endian machine, and only works
by accident if character cells are 8-bit wide.
Fix the BE<->LE conversions, so that now rasops1 works in all cases.
rasops2 and rasops4 might still need some help, but I'm not in a hurry to
meet a 4bpp big-endian frame buffer on a little-endian system...
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Plus it makes hangman more difficult.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
o remove unneeded headers.
o makes this to compile if RASOPS_SMALL is defined.
o makes rasops2 to compile.
|
| |
|
|
operations.
|