summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs')
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ABIVersioning.rst17
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst99
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/CapturingConfigInfo.rst88
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/DebugMode.rst100
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FeatureTestMacros.rst44
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FileTimeType.rst494
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ThreadingSupportAPI.rst83
-rw-r--r--lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst218
8 files changed, 0 insertions, 1143 deletions
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ABIVersioning.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ABIVersioning.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 5960dd18610..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ABIVersioning.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-
-====================
-Libc++ ABI stability
-====================
-
-Libc++ aims to preserve stable ABI to avoid subtle bugs when code built to the old ABI
-is linked with the code build to the new ABI. At the same time, libc++ allows ABI-breaking
-improvements and bugfixes for the scenarios when ABI change is not a issue.
-
-To support both cases, libc++ allows specifying the ABI version at the
-build time. The version is defined with a cmake option
-LIBCXX_ABI_VERSION. Another option LIBCXX_ABI_UNSTABLE can be used to
-include all present ABI breaking features. These options translate
-into C++ macro definitions _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION, _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE.
-
-Any ABI-changing feature is placed under it's own macro, _LIBCPP_ABI_XXX, which is enabled
-based on the value of _LIBCPP_ABI_VERSION. _LIBCPP_ABI_UNSTABLE, if set, enables all features at once.
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 4e6d80b50bf..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-===================
-Availability Markup
-===================
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-Overview
-========
-
-Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
-for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
-older version of the platform, clang provides the
-`availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>`_
-that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
-library.
-
-Design
-======
-
-When a new feature is introduced that requires dylib support, a macro should be
-created in include/__config to mark this feature as unavailable for all the
-systems. For example::
-
- // Define availability macros.
- #if defined(_LIBCPP_USE_AVAILABILITY_APPLE)
- # define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS __attribute__((unavailable))
- #else if defined(_LIBCPP_USE_AVAILABILITY_SOME_OTHER_VENDOR)
- # define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS __attribute__((unavailable))
- #else
- # define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS
- #endif
-
-When the library is updated by the platform vendor, the markup can be updated.
-For example::
-
- #define _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_SHARED_MUTEX \
- __attribute__((availability(macosx,strict,introduced=10.12))) \
- __attribute__((availability(ios,strict,introduced=10.0))) \
- __attribute__((availability(tvos,strict,introduced=10.0))) \
- __attribute__((availability(watchos,strict,introduced=3.0)))
-
-In the source code, the macro can be added on a class if the full class requires
-type info from the library for example::
-
- _LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_EXPERIMENTAL
- class _LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_BAD_OPTIONAL_ACCESS bad_optional_access
- : public std::logic_error {
-
-or on a particular symbol:
-
- _LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNC_VIS _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_SIZED_NEW_DELETE void operator delete(void* __p, std::size_t __sz) _NOEXCEPT;
-
-
-Testing
-=======
-
-Some parameters can be passed to lit to run the test-suite and exercise the
-availability.
-
-* The `platform` parameter controls the deployment target. For example lit can
- be invoked with `--param=platform=macosx10.8`. Default is the current host.
-* The `use_system_cxx_lib` parameter indicates to use another library than the
- just built one. Invoking lit with `--param=use_system_cxx_lib=true` will run
- the test-suite against the host system library. Alternatively a path to the
- directory containing a specific prebuilt libc++ can be used, for example:
- `--param=use_system_cxx_lib=/path/to/macOS/10.8/`.
-
-Tests can be marked as XFAIL based on multiple features made available by lit:
-
-
-* if `--param=platform=macosx10.8` is passed, the following features will be available:
-
- - availability
- - availability=x86_64
- - availability=macosx
- - availability=x86_64-macosx
- - availability=x86_64-apple-macosx10.8
- - availability=macosx10.8
-
- This feature is used to XFAIL a test that *is* using a class or a method marked
- as unavailable *and* that is expected to *fail* if deployed on an older system.
-
-* if `use_system_cxx_lib` and `--param=platform=macosx10.8` are passed to lit,
- the following features will also be available:
-
- - with_system_cxx_lib
- - with_system_cxx_lib=x86_64
- - with_system_cxx_lib=macosx
- - with_system_cxx_lib=x86_64-macosx
- - with_system_cxx_lib=x86_64-apple-macosx10.8
- - with_system_cxx_lib=macosx10.8
-
- This feature is used to XFAIL a test that is *not* using a class or a method
- marked as unavailable *but* that is expected to fail if deployed on an older
- system. For example, if the test exhibits a bug in the libc on a particular
- system version, or if the test uses a symbol that is not available on an
- older version of the dylib (but for which there is no availability markup,
- otherwise the XFAIL should use `availability` above).
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/CapturingConfigInfo.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/CapturingConfigInfo.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 29156bff8bc..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/CapturingConfigInfo.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,88 +0,0 @@
-=======================================================
-Capturing configuration information during installation
-=======================================================
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-The Problem
-===========
-
-Currently the libc++ supports building the library with a number of different
-configuration options. Unfortunately all of that configuration information is
-lost when libc++ is installed. In order to support "persistent"
-configurations libc++ needs a mechanism to capture the configuration options
-in the INSTALLED headers.
-
-
-Design Goals
-============
-
-* The solution should not INSTALL any additional headers. We don't want an extra
- #include slowing everybody down.
-
-* The solution should not unduly affect libc++ developers. The problem is limited
- to installed versions of libc++ and the solution should be as well.
-
-* The solution should not modify any existing headers EXCEPT during installation.
- It makes developers lives harder if they have to regenerate the libc++ headers
- every time they are modified.
-
-* The solution should not make any of the libc++ headers dependent on
- files generated by the build system. The headers should be able to compile
- out of the box without any modification.
-
-* The solution should not have ANY effect on users who don't need special
- configuration options. The vast majority of users will never need this so it
- shouldn't cost them.
-
-
-The Solution
-============
-
-When you first configure libc++ using CMake we check to see if we need to
-capture any options. If we haven't been given any "persistent" options then
-we do NOTHING.
-
-Otherwise we create a custom installation rule that modifies the installed __config
-header. The rule first generates a dummy "__config_site" header containing the required
-#defines. The contents of the dummy header are then prepended to the installed
-__config header. By manually prepending the files we avoid the cost of an
-extra #include and we allow the __config header to be ignorant of the extra
-configuration all together. An example "__config" header generated when
--DLIBCXX_ENABLE_THREADS=OFF is given to CMake would look something like:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
- //
- // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
- //
- // This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
- // Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
- //
- //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
- #ifndef _LIBCPP_CONFIG_SITE
- #define _LIBCPP_CONFIG_SITE
-
- /* #undef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_GLOBAL_FILESYSTEM_NAMESPACE */
- /* #undef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STDIN */
- /* #undef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STDOUT */
- #define _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS
- /* #undef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_MONOTONIC_CLOCK */
- /* #undef _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREAD_UNSAFE_C_FUNCTIONS */
-
- #endif
- // -*- C++ -*-
- //===--------------------------- __config ---------------------------------===//
- //
- // The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
- //
- // This file is dual licensed under the MIT and the University of Illinois Open
- // Source Licenses. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
- //
- //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
-
- #ifndef _LIBCPP_CONFIG
- #define _LIBCPP_CONFIG
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/DebugMode.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/DebugMode.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 3b997d44607..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/DebugMode.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
-==========
-Debug Mode
-==========
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-.. _using-debug-mode:
-
-Using Debug Mode
-================
-
-Libc++ provides a debug mode that enables assertions meant to detect incorrect
-usage of the standard library. By default these assertions are disabled but
-they can be enabled using the ``_LIBCPP_DEBUG`` macro.
-
-**_LIBCPP_DEBUG** Macro
------------------------
-
-**_LIBCPP_DEBUG**:
- This macro is used to enable assertions and iterator debugging checks within
- libc++. By default it is undefined.
-
- **Values**: ``0``, ``1``
-
- Defining ``_LIBCPP_DEBUG`` to ``0`` or greater enables most of libc++'s
- assertions. Defining ``_LIBCPP_DEBUG`` to ``1`` enables "iterator debugging"
- which provides additional assertions about the validity of iterators used by
- the program.
-
- Note that this option has no effect on libc++'s ABI
-
-**_LIBCPP_DEBUG_USE_EXCEPTIONS**:
- When this macro is defined ``_LIBCPP_ASSERT`` failures throw
- ``__libcpp_debug_exception`` instead of aborting. Additionally this macro
- disables exception specifications on functions containing ``_LIBCPP_ASSERT``
- checks. This allows assertion failures to correctly throw through these
- functions.
-
-Handling Assertion Failures
----------------------------
-
-When a debug assertion fails the assertion handler is called via the
-``std::__libcpp_debug_function`` function pointer. It is possible to override
-this function pointer using a different handler function. Libc++ provides two
-different assertion handlers, the default handler
-``std::__libcpp_abort_debug_handler`` which aborts the program, and
-``std::__libcpp_throw_debug_handler`` which throws an instance of
-``std::__libcpp_debug_exception``. Libc++ can be changed to use the throwing
-assertion handler as follows:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- #define _LIBCPP_DEBUG 1
- #include <string>
- int main() {
- std::__libcpp_debug_function = std::__libcpp_throw_debug_function;
- try {
- std::string::iterator bad_it;
- std::string str("hello world");
- str.insert(bad_it, '!'); // causes debug assertion
- } catch (std::__libcpp_debug_exception const&) {
- return EXIT_SUCCESS;
- }
- return EXIT_FAILURE;
- }
-
-Debug Mode Checks
-=================
-
-Libc++'s debug mode offers two levels of checking. The first enables various
-precondition checks throughout libc++. The second additionally enables
-"iterator debugging" which checks the validity of iterators used by the program.
-
-Basic Checks
-============
-
-These checks are enabled when ``_LIBCPP_DEBUG`` is defined to either 0 or 1.
-
-The following checks are enabled by ``_LIBCPP_DEBUG``:
-
- * FIXME: Update this list
-
-Iterator Debugging Checks
-=========================
-
-These checks are enabled when ``_LIBCPP_DEBUG`` is defined to 1.
-
-The following containers and STL classes support iterator debugging:
-
- * ``std::string``
- * ``std::vector<T>`` (``T != bool``)
- * ``std::list``
- * ``std::unordered_map``
- * ``std::unordered_multimap``
- * ``std::unordered_set``
- * ``std::unordered_multiset``
-
-The remaining containers do not currently support iterator debugging.
-Patches welcome.
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FeatureTestMacros.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FeatureTestMacros.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index d55af96c674..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FeatureTestMacros.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-===================
-Feature Test Macros
-===================
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-Overview
-========
-
-Libc++ implements the C++ feature test macros as specified in the C++2a standard,
-and before that in non-normative guiding documents (`See cppreference <https://en.cppreference.com/w/User:D41D8CD98F/feature_testing_macros>`)
-
-Design
-======
-
-Feature test macros are tricky to track, implement, test, and document correctly.
-They must be available from a list of headers, they may have different values in
-different dialects, and they may or may not be implemented by libc++. In order to
-track all of these conditions correctly and easily, we want a Single Source of
-Truth (SSoT) that defines each feature test macro, its values, the headers it
-lives in, and whether or not is is implemented by libc++. From this SSoA we
-have enough information to automatically generate the `<version>` header,
-the tests, and the documentation.
-
-Therefore we maintain a SSoA in
-`libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.limits/support.limits.general/generate_feature_test_macro_components.py`
-which doubles as a script to generate the following components:
-
-* The `<version>` header.
-* The version tests under `support.limits.general`.
-* Documentation of libc++'s implementation of each macro.
-
-Usage
-=====
-
-The `generate_feature_test_macro_components.py` script is used to track and
-update feature test macros in libc++.
-
-Whenever a feature test macro is added or changed, the table should be updated
-and the script should be re-ran. The script will clobber the existing test files
-and the documentation and it will generate a new `<version>` header as a
-temporary file. The generated `<version>` header should be merged with the
-existing one. \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FileTimeType.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FileTimeType.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 488ff174b34..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/FileTimeType.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,494 +0,0 @@
-==============
-File Time Type
-==============
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-.. _file-time-type-motivation:
-
-Motivation
-==========
-
-The filesystem library provides interfaces for getting and setting the last
-write time of a file or directory. The interfaces use the ``file_time_type``
-type, which is a specialization of ``chrono::time_point`` for the
-"filesystem clock". According to [fs.filesystem.syn]
-
- trivial-clock is an implementation-defined type that satisfies the
- Cpp17TrivialClock requirements ([time.clock.req]) and that is capable of
- representing and measuring file time values. Implementations should ensure
- that the resolution and range of file_­time_­type reflect the operating
- system dependent resolution and range of file time values.
-
-
-On POSIX systems, file times are represented using the ``timespec`` struct,
-which is defined as follows:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- struct timespec {
- time_t tv_sec;
- long tv_nsec;
- };
-
-To represent the range and resolution of ``timespec``, we need to (A) have
-nanosecond resolution, and (B) use more than 64 bits (assuming a 64 bit ``time_t``).
-
-As the standard requires us to use the ``chrono`` interface, we have to define
-our own filesystem clock which specifies the period and representation of
-the time points and duration it provides. It will look like this:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- struct _FilesystemClock {
- using period = nano;
- using rep = TBD; // What is this?
-
- using duration = chrono::duration<rep, period>;
- using time_point = chrono::time_point<_FilesystemClock>;
-
- // ... //
- };
-
- using file_time_type = _FilesystemClock::time_point;
-
-
-To get nanosecond resolution, we simply define ``period`` to be ``std::nano``.
-But what type can we use as the arithmetic representation that is capable
-of representing the range of the ``timespec`` struct?
-
-Problems To Consider
-====================
-
-Before considering solutions, let's consider the problems they should solve,
-and how important solving those problems are:
-
-
-Having a Smaller Range than ``timespec``
-----------------------------------------
-
-One solution to the range problem is to simply reduce the resolution of
-``file_time_type`` to be less than that of nanoseconds. This is what libc++'s
-initial implementation of ``file_time_type`` did; it's also what
-``std::system_clock`` does. As a result, it can represent time points about
-292 thousand years on either side of the epoch, as opposed to only 292 years
-at nanosecond resolution.
-
-``timespec`` can represent time points +/- 292 billion years from the epoch
-(just in case you needed a time point 200 billion years before the big bang,
-and with nanosecond resolution).
-
-To get the same range, we would need to drop our resolution to that of seconds
-to come close to having the same range.
-
-This begs the question, is the range problem "really a problem"? Sane usages
-of file time stamps shouldn't exceed +/- 300 years, so should we care to support it?
-
-I believe the answer is yes. We're not designing the filesystem time API, we're
-providing glorified C++ wrappers for it. If the underlying API supports
-a value, then we should too. Our wrappers should not place artificial restrictions
-on users that are not present in the underlying filesystem.
-
-Having a smaller range that the underlying filesystem forces the
-implementation to report ``value_too_large`` errors when it encounters a time
-point that it can't represent. This can cause the call to ``last_write_time``
-to throw in cases where the user was confident the call should succeed. (See below)
-
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- #include <filesystem>
- using namespace std::filesystem;
-
- // Set the times using the system interface.
- void set_file_times(const char* path, struct timespec ts) {
- timespec both_times[2];
- both_times[0] = ts;
- both_times[1] = ts;
- int result = ::utimensat(AT_FDCWD, path, both_times, 0);
- assert(result != -1);
- }
-
- // Called elsewhere to set the file time to something insane, and way
- // out of the 300 year range we might expect.
- void some_bad_persons_code() {
- struct timespec new_times;
- new_times.tv_sec = numeric_limits<time_t>::max();
- new_times.tv_nsec = 0;
- set_file_times("/tmp/foo", new_times); // OK, supported by most FSes
- }
-
- int main() {
- path p = "/tmp/foo";
- file_status st = status(p);
- if (!exists(st) || !is_regular_file(st))
- return 1;
- if ((st.permissions() & perms::others_read) == perms::none)
- return 1;
- // It seems reasonable to assume this call should succeed.
- file_time_type tp = last_write_time(p); // BAD! Throws value_too_large.
- }
-
-
-Having a Smaller Resolution than ``timespec``
----------------------------------------------
-
-As mentioned in the previous section, one way to solve the range problem
-is by reducing the resolution. But matching the range of ``timespec`` using a
-64 bit representation requires limiting the resolution to seconds.
-
-So we might ask: Do users "need" nanosecond precision? Is seconds not good enough?
-I limit my consideration of the point to this: Why was it not good enough for
-the underlying system interfaces? If it wasn't good enough for them, then it
-isn't good enough for us. Our job is to match the filesystems range and
-representation, not design it.
-
-
-Having a Larger Range than ``timespec``
-----------------------------------------
-
-We should also consider the opposite problem of having a ``file_time_type``
-that is able to represent a larger range than ``timespec``. At least in
-this case ``last_write_time`` can be used to get and set all possible values
-supported by the underlying filesystem; meaning ``last_write_time(p)`` will
-never throw a overflow error when retrieving a value.
-
-However, this introduces a new problem, where users are allowed to attempt to
-create a time point beyond what the filesystem can represent. Two particular
-values which cause this are ``file_time_type::min()`` and
-``file_time_type::max()``. As a result, the following code would throw:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- void test() {
- last_write_time("/tmp/foo", file_time_type::max()); // Throws
- last_write_time("/tmp/foo", file_time_type::min()); // Throws.
- }
-
-Apart from cases explicitly using ``min`` and ``max``, I don't see users taking
-a valid time point, adding a couple hundred billions of years in error,
-and then trying to update a file's write time to that value very often.
-
-Compared to having a smaller range, this problem seems preferable. At least
-now we can represent any time point the filesystem can, so users won't be forced
-to revert back to system interfaces to avoid limitations in the C++ STL.
-
-I posit that we should only consider this concern *after* we have something
-with at least the same range and resolution of the underlying filesystem. The
-latter two problems are much more important to solve.
-
-Potential Solutions And Their Complications
-===========================================
-
-Source Code Portability Across Implementations
------------------------------------------------
-
-As we've discussed, ``file_time_type`` needs a representation that uses more
-than 64 bits. The possible solutions include using ``__int128_t``, emulating a
-128 bit integer using a class, or potentially defining a ``timespec`` like
-arithmetic type. All three will allow us to, at minimum, match the range
-and resolution, and the last one might even allow us to match them exactly.
-
-But when considering these potential solutions we need to consider more than
-just the values they can represent. We need to consider the effects they will
-have on users and their code. For example, each of them breaks the following
-code in some way:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- // Bug caused by an unexpected 'rep' type returned by count.
- void print_time(path p) {
- // __int128_t doesn't have streaming operators, and neither would our
- // custom arithmetic types.
- cout << last_write_time(p).time_since_epoch().count() << endl;
- }
-
- // Overflow during creation bug.
- file_time_type timespec_to_file_time_type(struct timespec ts) {
- // woops! chrono::seconds and chrono::nanoseconds use a 64 bit representation
- // this may overflow before it's converted to a file_time_type.
- auto dur = seconds(ts.tv_sec) + nanoseconds(ts.tv_nsec);
- return file_time_type(dur);
- }
-
- file_time_type correct_timespec_to_file_time_type(struct timespec ts) {
- // This is the correct version of the above example, where we
- // avoid using the chrono typedefs as they're not sufficient.
- // Can we expect users to avoid this bug?
- using fs_seconds = chrono::duration<file_time_type::rep>;
- using fs_nanoseconds = chrono::duration<file_time_type::rep, nano>;
- auto dur = fs_seconds(ts.tv_sec) + fs_nanoseconds(tv.tv_nsec);
- return file_time_type(dur);
- }
-
- // Implicit truncation during conversion bug.
- intmax_t get_time_in_seconds(path p) {
- using fs_seconds = duration<file_time_type::rep, ratio<1, 1> >;
- auto tp = last_write_time(p);
-
- // This works with truncation for __int128_t, but what does it do for
- // our custom arithmetic types.
- return duration_cast<fs_seconds>().count();
- }
-
-
-Each of the above examples would require a user to adjust their filesystem code
-to the particular eccentricities of the representation, hopefully only in such
-a way that the code is still portable across implementations.
-
-At least some of the above issues are unavoidable, no matter what
-representation we choose. But some representations may be quirkier than others,
-and, as I'll argue later, using an actual arithmetic type (``__int128_t``)
-provides the least aberrant behavior.
-
-
-Chrono and ``timespec`` Emulation.
-----------------------------------
-
-One of the options we've considered is using something akin to ``timespec``
-to represent the ``file_time_type``. It only seems natural seeing as that's
-what the underlying system uses, and because it might allow us to match
-the range and resolution exactly. But would it work with chrono? And could
-it still act at all like a ``timespec`` struct?
-
-For ease of consideration, let's consider what the implementation might
-look like.
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- struct fs_timespec_rep {
- fs_timespec_rep(long long v)
- : tv_sec(v / nano::den), tv_nsec(v % nano::den)
- { }
- private:
- time_t tv_sec;
- long tv_nsec;
- };
- bool operator==(fs_timespec_rep, fs_timespec_rep);
- fs_int128_rep operator+(fs_timespec_rep, fs_timespec_rep);
- // ... arithmetic operators ... //
-
-The first thing to notice is that we can't construct ``fs_timespec_rep`` like
-a ``timespec`` by passing ``{secs, nsecs}``. Instead we're limited to
-constructing it from a single 64 bit integer.
-
-We also can't allow the user to inspect the ``tv_sec`` or ``tv_nsec`` values
-directly. A ``chrono::duration`` represents its value as a tick period and a
-number of ticks stored using ``rep``. The representation is unaware of the
-tick period it is being used to represent, but ``timespec`` is setup to assume
-a nanosecond tick period; which is the only case where the names ``tv_sec``
-and ``tv_nsec`` match the values they store.
-
-When we convert a nanosecond duration to seconds, ``fs_timespec_rep`` will
-use ``tv_sec`` to represent the number of giga seconds, and ``tv_nsec`` the
-remaining seconds. Let's consider how this might cause a bug were users allowed
-to manipulate the fields directly.
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- template <class Period>
- timespec convert_to_timespec(duration<fs_time_rep, Period> dur) {
- fs_timespec_rep rep = dur.count();
- return {rep.tv_sec, rep.tv_nsec}; // Oops! Period may not be nanoseconds.
- }
-
- template <class Duration>
- Duration convert_to_duration(timespec ts) {
- Duration dur({ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec}); // Oops! Period may not be nanoseconds.
- return file_time_type(dur);
- file_time_type tp = last_write_time(p);
- auto dur =
- }
-
- time_t extract_seconds(file_time_type tp) {
- // Converting to seconds is a silly bug, but I could see it happening.
- using SecsT = chrono::duration<file_time_type::rep, ratio<1, 1>>;
- auto secs = duration_cast<Secs>(tp.time_since_epoch());
- // tv_sec is now representing gigaseconds.
- return secs.count().tv_sec; // Oops!
- }
-
-Despite ``fs_timespec_rep`` not being usable in any manner resembling
-``timespec``, it still might buy us our goal of matching its range exactly,
-right?
-
-Sort of. Chrono provides a specialization point which specifies the minimum
-and maximum values for a custom representation. It looks like this:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- template <>
- struct duration_values<fs_timespec_rep> {
- static fs_timespec_rep zero();
- static fs_timespec_rep min();
- static fs_timespec_rep max() { // assume friendship.
- fs_timespec_rep val;
- val.tv_sec = numeric_limits<time_t>::max();
- val.tv_nsec = nano::den - 1;
- return val;
- }
- };
-
-Notice that ``duration_values`` doesn't tell the representation what tick
-period it's actually representing. This would indeed correctly limit the range
-of ``duration<fs_timespec_rep, nano>`` to exactly that of ``timespec``. But
-nanoseconds isn't the only tick period it will be used to represent. For
-example:
-
-.. code-block:: cpp
-
- void test() {
- using rep = file_time_type::rep;
- using fs_nsec = duration<rep, nano>;
- using fs_sec = duration<rep>;
- fs_nsec nsecs(fs_seconds::max()); // Truncates
- }
-
-Though the above example may appear silly, I think it follows from the incorrect
-notion that using a ``timespec`` rep in chrono actually makes it act as if it
-were an actual ``timespec``.
-
-Interactions with 32 bit ``time_t``
------------------------------------
-
-Up until now we've only be considering cases where ``time_t`` is 64 bits, but what
-about 32 bit systems/builds where ``time_t`` is 32 bits? (this is the common case
-for 32 bit builds).
-
-When ``time_t`` is 32 bits, we can implement ``file_time_type`` simply using 64-bit
-``long long``. There is no need to get either ``__int128_t`` or ``timespec`` emulation
-involved. And nor should we, as it would suffer from the numerous complications
-described by this paper.
-
-Obviously our implementation for 32-bit builds should act as similarly to the
-64-bit build as possible. Code which compiles in one, should compile in the other.
-This consideration is important when choosing between ``__int128_t`` and
-emulating ``timespec``. The solution which provides the most uniformity with
-the least eccentricity is the preferable one.
-
-Summary
-=======
-
-The ``file_time_type`` time point is used to represent the write times for files.
-Its job is to act as part of a C++ wrapper for less ideal system interfaces. The
-underlying filesystem uses the ``timespec`` struct for the same purpose.
-
-However, the initial implementation of ``file_time_type`` could not represent
-either the range or resolution of ``timespec``, making it unsuitable. Fixing
-this requires an implementation which uses more than 64 bits to store the
-time point.
-
-We primarily considered two solutions: Using ``__int128_t`` and using a
-arithmetic emulation of ``timespec``. Each has its pros and cons, and both
-come with more than one complication.
-
-The Potential Solutions
------------------------
-
-``long long`` - The Status Quo
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-Pros:
-
-* As a type ``long long`` plays the nicest with others:
-
- * It works with streaming operators and other library entities which support
- builtin integer types, but don't support ``__int128_t``.
- * Its the representation used by chrono's ``nanosecond`` and ``second`` typedefs.
-
-Cons:
-
-* It cannot provide the same resolution as ``timespec`` unless we limit it
- to a range of +/- 300 years from the epoch.
-* It cannot provide the same range as ``timespec`` unless we limit its resolution
- to seconds.
-* ``last_write_time`` has to report an error when the time reported by the filesystem
- is unrepresentable.
-
-__int128_t
-~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-Pros:
-
-* It is an integer type.
-* It makes the implementation simple and efficient.
-* Acts exactly like other arithmetic types.
-* Can be implicitly converted to a builtin integer type by the user.
-
- * This is important for doing things like:
-
- .. code-block:: cpp
-
- void c_interface_using_time_t(const char* p, time_t);
-
- void foo(path p) {
- file_time_type tp = last_write_time(p);
- time_t secs = duration_cast<seconds>(tp.time_since_epoch()).count();
- c_interface_using_time_t(p.c_str(), secs);
- }
-
-Cons:
-
-* It isn't always available (but on 64 bit machines, it normally is).
-* It causes ``file_time_type`` to have a larger range than ``timespec``.
-* It doesn't always act the same as other builtin integer types. For example
- with ``cout`` or ``to_string``.
-* Allows implicit truncation to 64 bit integers.
-* It can be implicitly converted to a builtin integer type by the user,
- truncating its value.
-
-Arithmetic ``timespec`` Emulation
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-Pros:
-
-* It has the exact same range and resolution of ``timespec`` when representing
- a nanosecond tick period.
-* It's always available, unlike ``__int128_t``.
-
-Cons:
-
-* It has a larger range when representing any period longer than a nanosecond.
-* Doesn't actually allow users to use it like a ``timespec``.
-* The required representation of using ``tv_sec`` to store the giga tick count
- and ``tv_nsec`` to store the remainder adds nothing over a 128 bit integer,
- but complicates a lot.
-* It isn't a builtin integer type, and can't be used anything like one.
-* Chrono can be made to work with it, but not nicely.
-* Emulating arithmetic classes come with their own host of problems regarding
- overload resolution (Each operator needs three SFINAE constrained versions of
- it in order to act like builtin integer types).
-* It offers little over simply using ``__int128_t``.
-* It acts the most differently than implementations using an actual integer type,
- which has a high chance of breaking source compatibility.
-
-
-Selected Solution - Using ``__int128_t``
-=========================================
-
-The solution I selected for libc++ is using ``__int128_t`` when available,
-and otherwise falling back to using ``long long`` with nanosecond precision.
-
-When ``__int128_t`` is available, or when ``time_t`` is 32-bits, the implementation
-provides same resolution and a greater range than ``timespec``. Otherwise
-it still provides the same resolution, but is limited to a range of +/- 300
-years. This final case should be rather rare, as ``__int128_t``
-is normally available in 64-bit builds, and ``time_t`` is normally 32-bits
-during 32-bit builds.
-
-Although falling back to ``long long`` and nanosecond precision is less than
-ideal, it also happens to be the implementation provided by both libstdc++
-and MSVC. (So that makes it better, right?)
-
-Although the ``timespec`` emulation solution is feasible and would largely
-do what we want, it comes with too many complications, potential problems
-and discrepancies when compared to "normal" chrono time points and durations.
-
-An emulation of a builtin arithmetic type using a class is never going to act
-exactly the same, and the difference will be felt by users. It's not reasonable
-to expect them to tolerate and work around these differences. And once
-we commit to an ABI it will be too late to change. Committing to this seems
-risky.
-
-Therefore, ``__int128_t`` seems like the better solution.
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ThreadingSupportAPI.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ThreadingSupportAPI.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 330ce74cf77..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/ThreadingSupportAPI.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
-=====================
-Threading Support API
-=====================
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-Overview
-========
-
-Libc++ supports using multiple different threading models and configurations
-to implement the threading parts of libc++, including ``<thread>`` and ``<mutex>``.
-These different models provide entirely different interfaces from each
-other. To address this libc++ wraps the underlying threading API in a new and
-consistent API, which it uses internally to implement threading primitives.
-
-The ``<__threading_support>`` header is where libc++ defines its internal
-threading interface. It contains forward declarations of the internal threading
-interface as well as definitions for the interface.
-
-External Threading API and the ``<__external_threading>`` header
-================================================================
-
-In order to support vendors with custom threading API's libc++ allows the
-entire internal threading interface to be provided by an external,
-vendor provided, header.
-
-When ``_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_EXTERNAL`` is defined the ``<__threading_support>``
-header simply forwards to the ``<__external_threading>`` header (which must exist).
-It is expected that the ``<__external_threading>`` header provide the exact
-interface normally provided by ``<__threading_support>``.
-
-External Threading Library
-==========================
-
-libc++ can be compiled with its internal threading API delegating to an external
-library. Such a configuration is useful for library vendors who wish to
-distribute a thread-agnostic libc++ library, where the users of the library are
-expected to provide the implementation of the libc++ internal threading API.
-
-On a production setting, this would be achieved through a custom
-``<__external_threading>`` header, which declares the libc++ internal threading
-API but leaves out the implementation.
-
-The ``-DLIBCXX_BUILD_EXTERNAL_THREAD_LIBRARY`` option allows building libc++ in
-such a configuration while allowing it to be tested on a platform that supports
-any of the threading systems (e.g. pthread) supported in ``__threading_support``
-header. Therefore, the main purpose of this option is to allow testing of this
-particular configuration of the library without being tied to a vendor-specific
-threading system. This option is only meant to be used by libc++ library
-developers.
-
-Threading Configuration Macros
-==============================
-
-**_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS**
- This macro is defined when libc++ is built without threading support. It
- should not be manually defined by the user.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_EXTERNAL**
- This macro is defined when libc++ should use the ``<__external_threading>``
- header to provide the internal threading API. This macro overrides
- ``_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_PTHREAD``.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_PTHREAD**
- This macro is defined when libc++ should use POSIX threads to implement the
- internal threading API.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_WIN32**
- This macro is defined when libc++ should use Win32 threads to implement the
- internal threading API.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_LIBRARY_EXTERNAL**
- This macro is defined when libc++ expects the definitions of the internal
- threading API to be provided by an external library. When defined
- ``<__threading_support>`` will only provide the forward declarations and
- typedefs for the internal threading API.
-
-**_LIBCPP_BUILDING_THREAD_LIBRARY_EXTERNAL**
- This macro is used to build an external threading library using the
- ``<__threading_support>``. Specifically it exposes the threading API
- definitions in ``<__threading_support>`` as non-inline definitions meant to
- be compiled into a library.
diff --git a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst b/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index d0d4f0adb22..00000000000
--- a/lib/libcxx/docs/DesignDocs/VisibilityMacros.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,218 +0,0 @@
-========================
-Symbol Visibility Macros
-========================
-
-.. contents::
- :local:
-
-Overview
-========
-
-Libc++ uses various "visibility" macros in order to provide a stable ABI in
-both the library and the headers. These macros work by changing the
-visibility and inlining characteristics of the symbols they are applied to.
-
-Visibility Macros
-=================
-
-**_LIBCPP_HIDDEN**
- Mark a symbol as hidden so it will not be exported from shared libraries.
-
-**_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS**
- Mark a symbol as being exported by the libc++ library. This attribute must
- be applied to the declaration of all functions exported by the libc++ dylib.
-
-**_LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI**
- Mark a symbol as being exported by the libc++ library. This attribute may
- only be applied to objects defined in the libc++ runtime library. On Windows,
- this macro applies `dllimport`/`dllexport` to the symbol, and on other
- platforms it gives the symbol default visibility.
-
-**_LIBCPP_OVERRIDABLE_FUNC_VIS**
- Mark a symbol as being exported by the libc++ library, but allow it to be
- overridden locally. On non-Windows, this is equivalent to `_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS`.
- This macro is applied to all `operator new` and `operator delete` overloads.
-
- **Windows Behavior**: Any symbol marked `dllimport` cannot be overridden
- locally, since `dllimport` indicates the symbol should be bound to a separate
- DLL. All `operator new` and `operator delete` overloads are required to be
- locally overridable, and therefore must not be marked `dllimport`. On Windows,
- this macro therefore expands to `__declspec(dllexport)` when building the
- library and has an empty definition otherwise.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI**
- Mark a function as not being part of the ABI of any final linked image that
- uses it.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1**
- Mark a function as being hidden from the ABI (per `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`)
- when libc++ is built with an ABI version after ABI v1. This macro is used to
- maintain ABI compatibility for symbols that have been historically exported
- by libc++ in v1 of the ABI, but that we don't want to export in the future.
-
- This macro works as follows. When we build libc++, we either hide the symbol
- from the ABI (if the symbol is not part of the ABI in the version we're
- building), or we leave it included. From user code (i.e. when we're not
- building libc++), the macro always marks symbols as internal so that programs
- built using new libc++ headers stop relying on symbols that are removed from
- the ABI in a future version. Each time we release a new stable version of the
- ABI, we should create a new _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_XXX macro, and we can
- use it to start removing symbols from the ABI after that stable version.
-
-**_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU**
- This macro controls whether symbols hidden from the ABI with `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`
- are local to each translation unit in addition to being local to each final
- linked image. This macro is defined to either 0 or 1. When it is defined to
- 1, translation units compiled with different versions of libc++ can be linked
- together, since all non ABI-facing functions are local to each translation unit.
- This allows static archives built with different versions of libc++ to be linked
- together. This also means that functions marked with `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI`
- are not guaranteed to have the same address across translation unit boundaries.
-
- When the macro is defined to 0, there is no guarantee that translation units
- compiled with different versions of libc++ can interoperate. However, this
- leads to code size improvements, since non ABI-facing functions can be
- deduplicated across translation unit boundaries.
-
- This macro can be defined by users to control the behavior they want from
- libc++. The default value of this macro (0 or 1) is controlled by whether
- `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU_BY_DEFAULT` is defined, which is intended to
- be used by vendors only (see below).
-
-**_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU_BY_DEFAULT**
- This macro controls the default value for `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU`.
- When the macro is defined, per TU ABI insulation is enabled by default, and
- `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU` is defined to 1 unless overridden by users.
- Otherwise, per TU ABI insulation is disabled by default, and
- `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU` is defined to 0 unless overridden by users.
-
- This macro is intended for vendors to control whether they want to ship
- libc++ with per TU ABI insulation enabled by default. Users can always
- control the behavior they want by defining `_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_PER_TU`
- appropriately.
-
- By default, this macro is not defined, which means that per TU ABI insulation
- is not provided unless explicitly overridden by users.
-
-**_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS**
- Mark a type's typeinfo, vtable and members as having default visibility.
- This attribute cannot be used on class templates.
-
-**_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS**
- Mark a type's typeinfo and vtable as having default visibility.
- This macro has no effect on the visibility of the type's member functions.
-
- **GCC Behavior**: GCC does not support Clang's `type_visibility(...)`
- attribute. With GCC the `visibility(...)` attribute is used and member
- functions are affected.
-
- **Windows Behavior**: DLLs do not support dllimport/export on class templates.
- The macro has an empty definition on this platform.
-
-
-**_LIBCPP_ENUM_VIS**
- Mark the typeinfo of an enum as having default visibility. This attribute
- should be applied to all enum declarations.
-
- **Windows Behavior**: DLLs do not support importing or exporting enumeration
- typeinfo. The macro has an empty definition on this platform.
-
- **GCC Behavior**: GCC un-hides the typeinfo for enumerations by default, even
- if `-fvisibility=hidden` is specified. Additionally applying a visibility
- attribute to an enum class results in a warning. The macro has an empty
- definition with GCC.
-
-**_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS**
- Mark the member functions, typeinfo, and vtable of the type named in
- a `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE` declaration as being exported by the libc++ library.
- This attribute must be specified on all extern class template declarations.
-
- This macro is used to override the `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` attribute
- specified on the primary template and to export the member functions produced
- by the explicit instantiation in the dylib.
-
- **GCC Behavior**: GCC ignores visibility attributes applied the type in
- extern template declarations and applying an attribute results in a warning.
- However since `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` is the same as
- `__attribute__((visibility("default"))` the visibility is already correct.
- The macro has an empty definition with GCC.
-
- **Windows Behavior**: `extern template` and `dllexport` are fundamentally
- incompatible *on a class template* on Windows; the former suppresses
- instantiation, while the latter forces it. Specifying both on the same
- declaration makes the class template be instantiated, which is not desirable
- inside headers. This macro therefore expands to `dllimport` outside of libc++
- but nothing inside of it (rather than expanding to `dllexport`); instead, the
- explicit instantiations themselves are marked as exported. Note that this
- applies *only* to extern *class* templates. Extern *function* templates obey
- regular import/export semantics, and applying `dllexport` directly to the
- extern template declaration (i.e. using `_LIBCPP_FUNC_VIS`) is the correct
- thing to do for them.
-
-**_LIBCPP_CLASS_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION_VIS**
- Mark the member functions, typeinfo, and vtable of an explicit instantiation
- of a class template as being exported by the libc++ library. This attribute
- must be specified on all class template explicit instantiations.
-
- It is only necessary to mark the explicit instantiation itself (as opposed to
- the extern template declaration) as exported on Windows, as discussed above.
- On all other platforms, this macro has an empty definition.
-
-**_LIBCPP_METHOD_TEMPLATE_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION_VIS**
- Mark a symbol as hidden so it will not be exported from shared libraries. This
- is intended specifically for method templates of either classes marked with
- `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` or classes with an extern template instantiation
- declaration marked with `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS`.
-
- When building libc++ with hidden visibility, we want explicit template
- instantiations to export members, which is consistent with existing Windows
- behavior. We also want classes annotated with `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` to export
- their members, which is again consistent with existing Windows behavior.
- Both these changes are necessary for clients to be able to link against a
- libc++ DSO built with hidden visibility without encountering missing symbols.
-
- An unfortunate side effect, however, is that method templates of classes
- either marked `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` or with extern template instantiation
- declarations marked with `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS` also get default
- visibility when instantiated. These methods are often implicitly instantiated
- inside other libraries which use the libc++ headers, and will therefore end up
- being exported from those libraries, since those implicit instantiations will
- receive default visibility. This is not acceptable for libraries that wish to
- control their visibility, and led to PR30642.
-
- Consequently, all such problematic method templates are explicitly marked
- either hidden (via this macro) or inline, so that they don't leak into client
- libraries. The problematic methods were found by running
- `bad-visibility-finder <https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder>`_
- against the libc++ headers after making `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` and
- `_LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_TYPE_VIS` expand to default visibility.
-
-**_LIBCPP_EXCEPTION_ABI**
- Mark the member functions, typeinfo, and vtable of the type as being exported
- by the libc++ library. This macro must be applied to all *exception types*.
- Exception types should be defined directly in namespace `std` and not the
- versioning namespace. This allows throwing and catching some exception types
- between libc++ and libstdc++.
-
-**_LIBCPP_INTERNAL_LINKAGE**
- Mark the affected entity as having internal linkage (i.e. the `static`
- keyword in C). This is only a best effort: when the `internal_linkage`
- attribute is not available, we fall back to forcing the function to be
- inlined, which approximates internal linkage since an externally visible
- symbol is never generated for that function. This is an internal macro
- used as an implementation detail by other visibility macros. Never mark
- a function or a class with this macro directly.
-
-**_LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE**
- Forces inlining of the function it is applied to. For visibility purposes,
- this macro is used to make sure that an externally visible symbol is never
- generated in an object file when the `internal_linkage` attribute is not
- available. This is an internal macro used by other visibility macros, and
- it should not be used directly.
-
-Links
-=====
-
-* `[cfe-dev] Visibility in libc++ - 1 <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-July/030610.html>`_
-* `[cfe-dev] Visibility in libc++ - 2 <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-August/031195.html>`_
-* `[libcxx] Visibility fixes for Windows <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130805/085461.html>`_